Einzige has been banned

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Wow. You're serious?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Despite me disagreeing with him on many occasions, it is a sad day for the forum.  The moderators need to unclench their asses and let some of that pent up gas out.  It really degrades the quality of the forum to have a couple of anal moderators running around reporting posts of people they don't like (Al, Masterjedi... ... Gustaf to some extent)

While Einzige had a lot of problems, I have to agree with this post. There is no accountability with the mods.

Al is especially a hypocrite constantly reporting posts while he trolls and flames with impunity.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

He brought nothing but piss and vinegar, if you get off on that, well there is still plenty of it around so you shouldn't miss him that much.

He wasn't any more insane than anybody else here.

Uh, that's stretching things quite a bit. Einzige was way out there, deranged even by Atlas standards.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Why!?

He was amusing and off-the-wall (even when he was aggressive), if certainly a kid with issues.

Meanwhile Libertas still roams free.

Wow, ridiculous.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Why!?

He was amusing and off-the-wall (even when he was aggressive), if certainly a kid with issues.

Meanwhile Libertas still roams free.

Agree.

Wow.

Only the most shameless of hacks would say that I deserve to be banned, and that Einzige didn't.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Fact is, Einzige needs to be in a mental institution.

^^^^ This, in all seriousness. Einzige needs psychiatric help.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Dave came very close to banning Einzige a while ago, fwiw. One thing that's become quite noticable over the years, is that 'problem posters' who are bad at toning things down every now and again tend to get banned much soon than those who are at least reasonably canny; a lot of the latter never get banned at all.

True.
And of course, those are - almost as a rule, here as everywhere - the worse lot.

I don't support the banning, but Einzige certainly represented the worst lot of them all on this forum.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

It baffles me that there are people that oppose this move.

Well there are also people who think Hamilton was a productive poster undeserving of banning. Go figure.

Anyway this is great news. Now we just got Libertas, Mint and Hamilton's sock to go.

BRTD, you are far more banworthy than Mint or I am.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

If so I would've been banned already.

Your point?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Pretty goddamn pathetic to ban him.

Since when were you an Einzige fanboy? Because he loved abortion?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

You mean you're not German!?!?!?

No, and neither is Quisling...the sad part of Einzige's self-glorification is that so many people here fell for it. Whenever he said anything about the real world it was pretty obvious that he didn't really know much about it.

Agreed on that point. Some of the younger and more naive people here took Einzige seriously, and a few even idolized him.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Pretty goddamn pathetic to ban him.

Since when were you an Einzige fanboy? Because he loved abortion?

No, I liked him because he was smart.

LOL.

Einzige deluded himself into thinking he was a genius. I see some other people fell for it too.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

He wasn't really a libertarian.

Haha.

Uh, he wasn't.

Why are you so personally invested in this in whitewashing Einzige's legacy. Were you his boyfriend or something?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

...says the "anarchist" who supports Republican candidates.  (I guess I'll let your current username slide.)

My ideology is consistent. Give it up, Joe.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Wow, I'm convinced. 


(And since people always need to say so for you, that was sarcasm.)

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

... which shows, once again, that you have a very limited understanding of what anarchism actually means.

No, it shows once again how intellectually shallow you are.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

I favor decentralization in all things, so certainly I oppose the existence of the federal government.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Is Libertas next?  That guy is an asshole.

I've done nothing worthy of being banned. I think you fit your description of me better than I do.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

Are you a Christian?

I would say I'm a deist.  I like Christianity, I was a Christian, but I can't say I believe Jesus was the Messiah.

Why don't you believe?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

I favor decentralization in all things, so certainly I oppose the existence of the federal government.

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism.  

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

Are you a Christian?

I would say I'm a deist.  I like Christianity, I was a Christian, but I can't say I believe Jesus was the Messiah.

Why don't you believe?

I don't know.  It was a gradual build up of doubt I suppose.  In my mind, I don't want to be led by a religion.  Religion was never all that important to me, I suppose I just grew out of it.

Anyways, perhaps you view it differently, but in my mind if you oppose a central government and favor state governments (do you favor state governments?) that makes you an anti-federalist.  

Of course, my opinion doesn't mean much.  You could just as easily call me a socialist because I believe in more regulation.

I favor no government as an ideal, other than local communities self-governing via direct democracy.