Can you be pro-life and shoot a deer? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 03:18:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Can you be pro-life and shoot a deer? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Can you be pro-life and shoot a deer?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Unsure
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Can you be pro-life and shoot a deer?  (Read 3658 times)
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


« on: September 07, 2005, 06:08:28 PM »

MissCatholic, you seem to like animals a lot, for all I know, you could be a vegetarian also.  Hey, I like animals, but I realize that there is a certain heirarchy that must be maintained, that we humans know to be self-evident.  Roughly, the order goes:

1.Humans (God put us on Earth (in part to maintain order here and watch over nature/animals and plants)
2."Helper or Intelligent Animals" those that serve a purpose in aiding humans.  For example, a dog watches out for the master in case of a break-in, and in turn gets attention and petting, (a mutual benefit).  Horses also fit in here, since they can give someone a ride.  Typical pets also serve a purpose here.
3."Wild Animals" just what the name implies.  These are sometimes alright to hunt, but not all the time.  Reason is that sometimes (like in a deer population), the deer overpopulate and rather than having them die painfully (starvation, because they can't find food in the winter), we can hunt a certain amount, and they'll die less painfully with a bullet.
4."Feeding Animals"are animals bred only to die and become meat product for humans.  Chickens and Cows fit in here.

Types 3 and 4 are okay to hunt/slaughter/whatever for our own means.  I don't understand why hunt when your not going to make some sort of use out of the animal body (whether it food, clothing or what have you) however, I respect that I am of a higher order than the animals.  It seems that it would be a bad analogy to compare this to abortion since abortion refers to the highest class of animals-humans.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2005, 02:36:43 PM »


2."Helper or Intelligent Animals" those that serve a purpose in aiding humans.  For example, a dog watches out for the master in case of a break-in, and in turn gets attention and petting, (a mutual benefit).  Horses also fit in here, since they can give someone a ride.  Typical pets also serve a purpose here.


Horses can be eaten.

They can be.  You can eat any animal, but they're not meant to be since they can mutually benefit living with humans.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.