Kentucky - OFFICIAL rumors and results thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 02:48:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Kentucky - OFFICIAL rumors and results thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Kentucky - OFFICIAL rumors and results thread  (Read 11127 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: May 20, 2008, 05:04:56 PM »

Folks, Kentucky knows how to count ballots quickly.  You'll get a lot further just going to the SOS site. 

http://electionresults.ky.gov/KyElectWeb/kes?AC=3&RF=0&AR=0&R=A01000000&L=1999&N=U.S.+PRESIDENT&RV=1040438&DV=1629845&TP=3545&TC=120
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2008, 05:10:09 PM »

Naturally, in early results from rural Eastern KY, Obama is getting massacred.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2008, 05:29:01 PM »

CNN finally has their county map up.

Mostly slaughter, although Obama is carrying Fayette (Lexington) in very early returns.

Ron Paul is winning Bath County with some truly hilarious turnout rates.

I didn't know there were any Republicans in Bath County, actually.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2008, 05:34:04 PM »
« Edited: May 20, 2008, 05:35:42 PM by Sam Spade »

The KY SOS site has 36.4% of Jefferson in and it is at 49-48 Obama.  I'm sure the racial voting is quite ugly there.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2008, 05:39:22 PM »

Now the way this should work is that Hillary will keep increasing her lead until some more precincts from Jefferson and Fayette come in.  and so on and so forth...
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2008, 05:49:14 PM »

About 18% of Fayette came in the KY SOS, which bumped Hillary's lead down to 54-43.

Obama leading Fayette 52-44 (civil servants, naturally).
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2008, 05:50:30 PM »

I wonder why there is a weird clustering of Dem results.  Like, all of the southeast has reported, but none of the northeast.

And also why some counties are reporting GOP results but not Dem results...

"Uncommitted" is heavily carrying Lincoln County in the GOP race, which I suspect is the typo of the day.

I'm not following CNN - in KY, the SOS is king and faster.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2008, 05:51:20 PM »

87% for Jefferson.  Obama leads 49-48.  Pushes Hillary's lead down to 51-46.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2008, 05:55:23 PM »

Owsley County - CD-05 is done (historically Republican).  Hillary 90%, Obama 8%, Edwards 2%.  Predictable.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2008, 05:56:16 PM »

Now the way this should work is that Hillary will keep increasing her lead until some more precincts from Jefferson and Fayette come in.  and so on and so forth...

bump
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2008, 05:59:22 PM »

So, um, why does Edwards suck so much?

The sort of areas where he's prone to do well aren't in yet. Wait and see.

You mean Western KY right?  Smiley

Right now, the results are overweighted towards Louisville, generally.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2008, 06:05:38 PM »

13%

Clinton 49%
Obama 48%

I understand "his" areas are coming in but should it really be this close?

Louisville and Lexington account for roughly 70% of the votes in on the state site with 22% of all precincts in.  Clinton is still up 54-43.  That should tell you what will soon happen.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2008, 06:11:22 PM »

College educated number for KY:  64% of voters  (just FYI)
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2008, 06:17:16 PM »

Taking a quick look at some of the almost completed (or not almost completed) counties in CD-05, I really don't think he's going to reach viability there.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2008, 07:22:50 PM »

Uncommitted is beating Edwards a lot this evening (including statewide). 

I wonder why...  (he asked rhetorically)
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2008, 07:30:19 PM »

It looks like the Edwards endorsement was a huge backfire.
This is a fantastic speech.

Obama again picked up zilch from undecided.

I don't know whether it backfired any.  I suspect it had no effect, actually.  Except to make Edwards supporters switch their vote in Uncommitted.  Predictable.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2008, 07:41:33 PM »

Taking a quick look at some of the almost completed (or not almost completed) counties in CD-05, I really don't think he's going to reach viability there.

I rechecked the numbers here, he's well under viability out there.  He'll be lucky to break 15% in a couple of counties, much less the CD.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2008, 09:50:02 PM »

Numbers-wise, the only real difference in the final totals is the % of blacks in the primaries of WV and KY.  Yes, it's more subtle than that, but generically that's what it looks like.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2008, 09:53:06 PM »

Hey, walter!  How'd the prediction go?  Smiley
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2008, 10:18:18 PM »
« Edited: May 20, 2008, 10:37:30 PM by Sam Spade »

Numbers-wise, the only real difference in the final totals is the % of blacks in the primaries of WV and KY.  Yes, it's more subtle than that, but generically that's what it looks like.

CD 5 in Kentucky seems to have an usually low number of white voters voting for Obama. It seems almost sui generis to me. I don't think West Virginia has anything to match it.

The SW coal counties are the closest really, and they are close in character to CD-5.  Truthfully, this is Al's territory, I'll let him answer the question.  Smiley

EDIT:  I should add - a lot of the part of northern Tennessee that borders this CD had very similar numbers to CD 5
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2008, 10:17:13 AM »

Numbers-wise, the only real difference in the final totals is the % of blacks in the primaries of WV and KY.  Yes, it's more subtle than that, but generically that's what it looks like.

I thought Kentucky Democratic primary electorate was around 14% black or so? wouldn't that have to mean that clinton did considerably better with KY whites than with WV whites?

The exit poll had blacks as only being 9%-10% of the primary electorate, iirc.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.