Politics and Elections in the Netherlands: coalition agreement presented
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 02:50:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Politics and Elections in the Netherlands: coalition agreement presented
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 95
Author Topic: Politics and Elections in the Netherlands: coalition agreement presented  (Read 274134 times)
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1775 on: March 16, 2017, 06:22:23 PM »
« edited: March 16, 2017, 06:23:56 PM by TheDeadFlagBlues »

totally depends on what your short-term priorities are as "lefties".....immigration rights are atm not my nr1 issue as long as we are literally still handling a few million immigrants from 2015....if we have "swallowed" that challenge we can talk again.

the primary goal of the far right during the last years has been destroying the EU, which seemed quite likely after brexit...one year later, this ambition has been crushed in Austria, in the Netherlands and - most likely - soon also in France.

So, in otherwords, a project of European elites that's primarily governed/steered by the European right has been successfully defended. So, uh, yeah, there's no reason for someone who's left-wing to celebrate (though maybe a reason to feel sort of relieved, I'll admit).
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1776 on: March 16, 2017, 06:23:14 PM »


A PVV-SP split seems to be the case, though PVV+SP only get around 35% of the votes, so my wording is wrong.

DELFZIJL

SP: 16.6%
PVV: 15.9%


EMMEN:

PVV: 18.6%
SP: 15.3%





Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1777 on: March 16, 2017, 06:30:29 PM »

One positive thing about the campaign is the fact that Rutte was clearly Pro-EU in the campaign and that he did not suddenly become eurosceptic before the election or tried to do a 'Cameron'
Haha, that was what he tried last time around. The smart thing about his campaign this year was that he didn't promise anything. He just sold feelings. "Ben je een optimist of een pessimist?" "Normaal. Doen." "[] Laat ze maar komen. [] Laat ze maar verrekken. [X] Laten we normaal doen." "Pleur op." and his casual use of the term "kopvodden" without endorsing it. It had nothing to do with policy. Previous VVD slogans and ads were policy oriented: lower taxes, punishing criminals, cutting social benefits, etc. This time, everything was devoid of any meaning. Yet it worked.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1778 on: March 16, 2017, 06:58:36 PM »
« Edited: March 16, 2017, 07:07:31 PM by DavidB. »

First and second party by municipality. Second party: VVD and CDA in civic belts in north, east and Green Heart. D66 in the Alkmaar-Nijmegen progressive belt. PVV in suburban, exurban and declining formerly industrial areas. CDA being 2nd in East Brabant shows how the PVV failed there. The PVV-grey west-east strip in the center of the country used to be deep PvdA red. The map of the second largest party is much more insightful than the VVD-blue map.

Note the lack of places where the PvdA are in 2nd place.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,335
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1779 on: March 16, 2017, 07:02:59 PM »

totally depends on what your short-term priorities are as "lefties".....immigration rights are atm not my nr1 issue as long as we are literally still handling a few million immigrants from 2015....if we have "swallowed" that challenge we can talk again.

the primary goal of the far right during the last years has been destroying the EU, which seemed quite likely after brexit...one year later, this ambition has been crushed in Austria, in the Netherlands and - most likely - soon also in France.

It makes you wonder: what would the reception be to a eurofederalist party that was also very anti-migration and sceptical of Islam? Not that I'd support such a venture, but it could be interesting.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1780 on: March 16, 2017, 07:04:52 PM »
« Edited: March 16, 2017, 07:12:47 PM by ApatheticAustrian »

So, in otherwords, a project of European elites that's primarily governed/steered by the European right has been successfully defended. So, uh, yeah, there's no reason for someone who's left-wing to celebrate (though maybe a reason to feel sort of relieved, I'll admit).

i understand your cynicism, it's just my underlining belief, that the only way to enshrine social-democratic victories of the past in the future is through the advanced integration of the EU states and in general even more global institutionalism.

as long as the social democratic parties of this continent are only playing defend against liars like wilders who wouldn't know how to fund their own promises, the christian democratic parties are more likely to win.......if the leftish/progressive parties can find a new narrative, i think they would be able to more competetive again ....and your bureaucratic monster is for me a tool to establish standards for welfare/working policies. but i digress....don't want to totally derail this thread.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1781 on: March 16, 2017, 08:02:07 PM »

Why are CU/SGP voters so young? Only because of high birth rates in the Bible Belt? Which of these 2 parties has younger voters? SGP?

DavidB would know this better than me, but I'll take a stab at it: the relative youth of the CU/SGP is a mix of high birth rates, non-Reformed Evangelicals not being on the scene very long, and a older voters from CU/SGP friendly churches being tribal CDA voters.

I would guess SGP is younger. From my experience, some of the more extreme Reformed Protestants are anti-contraception and SGP is more likely to harbour that sort of voter.

DavidB please feel free to smack me down if I'm totally wrong Tongue
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1782 on: March 16, 2017, 08:18:58 PM »

I think -- but it's an educated guess at most -- that this may be spot on except for the point on non-reformed evangelicals, who, while they exist, are so small a minority that they won't matter for the numbers. I know some of these people in the third category: non-Reformed right-wing (in terms of church) Protestant Church of the Netherlands people whose parents are lifelong CDA voters and who turn to the political right themselves (though CDA to CU is arguably a step to the left politically, but to the right religiously).
Logged
Diouf
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,508
Denmark
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1783 on: March 17, 2017, 06:36:43 AM »

totally depends on what your short-term priorities are as "lefties".....immigration rights are atm not my nr1 issue as long as we are literally still handling a few million immigrants from 2015....if we have "swallowed" that challenge we can talk again.

the primary goal of the far right during the last years has been destroying the EU, which seemed quite likely after brexit...one year later, this ambition has been crushed in Austria, in the Netherlands and - most likely - soon also in France.

It makes you wonder: what would the reception be to a eurofederalist party that was also very anti-migration and sceptical of Islam? Not that I'd support such a venture, but it could be interesting.

Well, if it is to be anti-migration, then it would have to be purely non-western migration it opposed for it to be logically coherent with EU-membership. I don't know if there would be much room for a committed eurofederalist party with these views, but it is a fairly standard centre-right position now to be broadly pro-EU, in favour of freedom of movement and the common market, as well as critical of Islam and wanting to tighten rules for non-western migrants. If the EU can reach agreement on an Australian-style system where you can't seek asylum from the EU area, I guess that is a eurofederalist step, but the parties in favour will mostly not brand it like that. Until that happens, the pro-EU parties will mostly try to tighten non-western migration within international rules, which limits how much you will be able to reduce it and therefore also to some degree the electoral effect.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1784 on: March 17, 2017, 10:12:59 AM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 03:27:50 PM by DavidB. »

The final turnout percentage is 80.8%, the highest since 1986.

People often vote for a woman for feminist reasons, but they usually picked the first woman on the list. She was often sure to be elected anyway, so a vote for the first woman on the list typically doesn't increase the number of women in parliament. For that reason, there was a campaign to vote for women who are placed just below an electable position on the list this time. If they are elected with preference votes this does alter the gender balance in parliament. This campaign seems to have had the effect that Isabelle Diks, #19 on the GL list, has been elected with preference votes... at the expense of another woman, Lisa Westerveld at #14. However, Westerveld herself can still reach the preference threshold too. On the PvdA list it appears that incumbent Development Aid Minister Lilianne Ploumen, #10, has been elected for similar reasons and personal popularity at the expense of the #9, William Moorlag.
Logged
SunSt0rm
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 624
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1785 on: March 17, 2017, 11:06:24 AM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 11:08:50 AM by SunSt0rm »

First and second party by municipality. Second party: VVD and CDA in civic belts in north, east and Green Heart. D66 in the Alkmaar-Nijmegen progressive belt. PVV in suburban, exurban and declining formerly industrial areas. CDA being 2nd in East Brabant shows how the PVV failed there. The PVV-grey west-east strip in the center of the country used to be deep PvdA red. The map of the second largest party is much more insightful than the VVD-blue map.

Note the lack of places where the PvdA are in 2nd place.


Eastern Brabant has always been CDA territory, its very rural. Check the map of 2010 and see it was CDA county then and not PVV. I am suprised by the strong performance of VVD in rural East Brabant and weak performance of CDA there.
Logged
SunSt0rm
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 624
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1786 on: March 17, 2017, 11:08:22 AM »

The final turnout percentage is 80.8%, the highest since 1989.

People often vote for a woman for feminist reasons, but they usually picked the first woman on the list. She was often sure to be elected anyway, so a vote for the first woman on the list typically doesn't increase the number of women in parliament. For that reason, there was a campaign to vote for women who are placed just below an electable position on the list this time. If they are elected with preference votes this does alter the gender balance in parliament. This campaign seems to have had the effect that Isabelle Diks, #19 on the GL list, has been elected with preference votes... at the expense of another woman, Lisa Westerveld at #14. However, Westerveld herself can still reach the preference threshold too. On the PvdA list it appears that incumbent Development Aid Minister Lilianne Ploumen, #10, has been elected for similar reasons and personal popularity at the expense of the #9, William Moorlag.

Ploumen became popular 1 month ago for her anti-abortion effort against Trump, not really suprising she has been elected tbh
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1787 on: March 17, 2017, 11:20:20 AM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 11:28:34 AM by DavidB. »

Eastern Brabant has always been CDA territory, its very rural. Check the map of 2010 and see it was CDA county then and not PVV. I am suprised by the strong performance of VVD in East Brabant and weak performance of CDA there.
Of course it has always been CDA territory, but it is also territory the PVV can and need to do better in if they want to do better than in 2010. The VVD's strong performance there can be directly attributed to the two core elements of their brand: being a populist people's party that is tough on crime and strict on immigration ("normaal doen" and "pleur op" should have worked here), and being a party that wants the government out of people's business and seeks to cut taxes. These are popular stances with middle-class people in these areas, where trust in the government is lower than outside the south. While the CDA made important gains there, Buma remains a Protestant and the CDA are less Catholic than ever. This doesn't directly matter to people, but the party does "feel" different to people now that it has become more northern. I also think the Prime Minister bonus may have played a role for Rutte in these areas, where politics is viewed in a more hierarchical sense (which can be attributed to the area being historically Catholic) and personal leadership is valued higher.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1788 on: March 17, 2017, 11:34:18 AM »

The clown Wilders lost. I remember him making racist remarks against Moroccans years back even before Trump & the alt-right phenomenon.

I think that is the big solace - That clown was even leading. There is time to rebuild the left ! Labour got decimated but atleast the Greens took a solid step forward !
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1789 on: March 17, 2017, 11:49:36 AM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?
Logged
mvd10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,709


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1790 on: March 17, 2017, 12:00:26 PM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?

I think they are less left-wing on economic issues than they used to be, but there still is that social christian vibe. And they are progressive on environmental issues.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1791 on: March 17, 2017, 12:03:30 PM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?


So many things could be solved by reading wikipedia...


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1792 on: March 17, 2017, 12:04:34 PM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?

Depends what you mean by social policy. They're quite conservative on abortion, euthanasia, gay rights etc, but more left leaning on immigration and the environment.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1793 on: March 17, 2017, 12:05:06 PM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?
Very conservative socially, left of center fiscally. SGP is more right-leaning fiscally
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1794 on: March 17, 2017, 12:11:46 PM »

So many things could be solved by reading wikipedia...


you are correct but i prefer learning about other countries/political parties through local "politicos"...usually more helpful and nuanced.


thanks for the answers. Smiley
Logged
SunSt0rm
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 624
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1795 on: March 17, 2017, 12:11:54 PM »

leftwingers should hope now that D66 & probably CU

is the CU a christian leftish party regarding social policy?

On environment and immigration they can be considered left. On Abortion, drugs and Euthanasia they are conservative. On the economy they are left to the CDA but right to the PvdA.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1796 on: March 17, 2017, 12:21:47 PM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 12:28:24 PM by DavidB. »

So many things could be solved by reading wikipedia...
So many misunderstandings would be solved if people on Atlas would use Wikipedia less and started asking questions to native posters more.

I'll add that I don't think CU have ever focused on being a green party as much as this time around.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1797 on: March 17, 2017, 01:19:55 PM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 05:24:24 PM by DavidB. »

(1 point):
Largest party: VVD
Largest in Amsterdam: GroenLinks
Largest in Utrecht (city)Sad GroenLinks
Largest in Rotterdam: PVV

Largest in Den Haag: VVD
3/5 points

(2 points):
Largest in Limburg: PVV
Largest in Zuid-Holland: VVD
Largest in Noord-Holland: VVD
Largest in Flevoland: VVD
Largest in Zeeland: VVD
Largest in Overijssel: CDA
Largest in Friesland: CDA

Largest in Groningen: CDA
Largest in Drenthe: VVD
Largest in Noord-Brabant: VVD
Largest in Utrecht (province)Sad VVD
Largest in Gelderland: VVD

22/24 points

(3 points):
PVV over or under 15.5% (2010 result)? Under
Predict the order of the following parties correctly: CDA, D66, GL? CDA, D66, GL
PVV over or under 30% in the municipality of Nissewaard? Under
Best VVD municipality? Laren
Best CDA municipality? Tubbergen
Best PVV municipality? Rucphen
Best GL municipality? Utrecht
Best D66 municipality? Wageningen
PvdA over or under 16% in Amsterdam? Under
PVV over or under 24% in Rotterdam? Under
PvdA over or under 10% in The Hague? Under

Predict the order of the following parties in The Hague correctly: VVD, D66, PVV. VVD, D66, PVV
PVV over or under 25% in Limburg? Under
Margin between VVD and PVV in Flevoland smaller or larger than 2 points? Over

DENK over or under 7% in The Hague? Under
39/45

(4 points)
Best FvD municipality? Utrecht (probably actually some random place)
Best DENK municipality? The Hague
Best VNL municipality? Rotterdam (probably actually some random place close to R'dam)

Which of DENK, FvD, PP and VNL get in? (only points if all correct) DENK and FvD
4/16

68 out of 90 points. Especially good predictions in the municipalities (let me know if I've made a mistake there, but I've been looking pretty hard to prove myself wrong.)

Prediction
(1 point):
Largest party: VVD
Largest in Amsterdam: D'66
Largest in Utrecht (city): GroenLinks
Largest in Rotterdam: PVV

Largest in Den Haag: VVD
2/5

(2 points):
Largest in Limburg: PVV
Largest in Zuid-Holland: VVD
Largest in Noord-Holland: VVD

Largest in Flevoland: PVV
Largest in Zeeland:CDA
Largest in Overijssel:CDA
Largest in Friesland: CDA

Largest in Groningen: SP
Largest in Drenthe: CDA
Largest in Noord-Brabant:CDA
Largest in Utrecht (province): D'66
Largest in Gelderland: CDA

12/24

(3 points):
PVV over or under 15.5% (2010 result)? OVER
Predict the order of the following parties correctly: CDA, D66, GL? CDA-D66-GL
PVV over or under 30% in the municipality of Nissewaard? OVER
Best VVD municipality? Wassenaar
Best CDA municipality? Tubbergen
Best PVV municipality? Rucphen
Best GL municipality? Utrecht
Best D66 municipality? Wageningen

PvdA over or under 16% in Amsterdam? Under
PVV over or under 24% in Rotterdam? Under
PvdA over or under 10% in The Hague? Under
Predict the order of the following parties in The Hague correctly: VVD, D66, PVV. VVD-PVV-D66

PVV over or under 25% in Limburg? Over
Margin between VVD and PVV in Flevoland smaller or larger than 2 points? Smaller
DENK over or under 7% in The Hague? Under

27/45

(4 points)
Best FvD municipality? Almere
Best DENK municipality? Amsterdam
Best VNL municipality? Rijswijk
Which of DENK, FvD, PP and VNL get in? (only points if all correct) DENK and FvD will get in.
4/16
Final seat prediction I will post tonight after the debate.
45 out of 90

Prediction
(1 point):
Largest party: VVD
Largest in Amsterdam: GL
Largest in Utrecht (city): GL
Largest in Rotterdam: PVV

Largest in Den Haag: VVD
3/5

(2 points):
Largest in Limburg: PVV
Largest in Zuid-Holland: VVD
Largest in Noord-Holland: VVD
Largest in Flevoland: VVD

Largest in Zeeland: CDA
Largest in Overijssel: CDA
Largest in Friesland: CDA

Largest in Groningen: SP
Largest in Drenthe: VVD
Largest in Noord-Brabant: VVD
Largest in Utrecht (province): VVD
Largest in Gelderland: VVD

22/24

(3 points):
PVV over or under 15.5% (2010 result)? Under
Predict the order of the following parties correctly: CDA, D66, GL? CDA-D66-GL
PVV over or under 30% in the municipality of Nissewaard? Under
Best VVD municipality? Laren
Best CDA municipality? Tubbergen
Best PVV municipality? Rucphen

Best GL municipality? Nijmegen
Best D66 municipality? Saba (if it counts Smiley otherwise Wageningen)
PvdA over or under 16% in Amsterdam? Under
PVV over or under 24% in Rotterdam? Under
PvdA over or under 10% in The Hague? Under
Predict the order of the following parties in The Hague correctly: VVD, D66, PVV. VVD-PVV-D66
PVV over or under 25% in Limburg? Under

Margin between VVD and PVV in Flevoland smaller or larger than 2 points? Smaller
DENK over or under 7% in The Hague? Under

36/45
(4 points)
Best FvD municipality? Almere
Best DENK municipality? Rotterdam
Best VNL municipality? Edam-Volendam

Which of DENK, FvD, PP and VNL get in? (only points if all correct) DENK & FvD
4/16
65 out of 90
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,627
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1798 on: March 17, 2017, 01:20:33 PM »
« Edited: March 17, 2017, 05:25:27 PM by DavidB. »

Prediction
(1 point):
Largest party: VVD
Largest in Amsterdam: GroenLinks
Largest in Utrecht (city): GroenLinks
Largest in Rotterdam: PVV

Largest in Den Haag: VVD
(In good belgian fashion I'll include the peripherals as a way to distance myself from the Randstad bubble Tongue)
Largest in Eindhoven: D66
Largest in Groningen : D66/SP
Largest in Nijmegen : SP
Largest in Maastricht : PVV, but win for the aggregated SP/GL. [aggregated GL/SP were going to win pretty much everywhere Tongue, DavidB.]
Largest in Parkstad Limburg : PVV
3/5

(2 points):
Largest in Limburg: PVV
Largest in Zuid-Holland: VVD
Largest in Noord-Holland: VVD

Largest in Flevoland: PVV
Largest in Zeeland:CDA
Largest in Overijssel:CDA
Largest in Friesland: CDA

Largest in Groningen: SP
Largest in Drenthe: CDA
Largest in Noord-Brabant:CDA

Largest in Utrecht (province): VVD
Largest in Gelderland: VVD

16/24

(3 points):
PVV over or under 15.5% (2010 result)? Over
Predict the order of the following parties correctly: CDA, D66, GL? CDA-GL-D66
PVV over or under 30% in the municipality of Nissewaard? Assuming this is a white flight suburb of ROtterdam, over.
Best VVD municipality? no idea
Best CDA municipality? probably somewhere in the Bible Belt that historically votes for them in GEs over CU SGP
Best PVV municipality? Almere

Best GL municipality? Utrecht I guess
Best D66 municipality? Wageningen
PvdA over or under 16% in Amsterdam? Over
PVV over or under 24% in Rotterdam? Over
PvdA over or under 10% in The Hague? Over

Predict the order of the following parties in The Hague correctly: VVD, D66, PVV. VVD-PVV-D66
PVV over or under 25% in Limburg? Over
Margin between VVD and PVV in Flevoland smaller or larger than 2 points? Larger
DENK over or under 7% in The Hague? Under
12/45

(4 points)
Best FvD municipality? somewhere in North Amsterdam or Flevoland  
Best DENK municipality? Amsterdam
Best VNL municipality? Scheveningen/Den Haag
Which of DENK, FvD, PP and VNL get in? FvD, Denk and PP due to Ancilla.

0/16
31 out of 90 points

Prediction
(1 point):
Largest party: VVD
Largest in Amsterdam: D66
Largest in Utrecht (city): GroenLinks

Largest in Rotterdam: PVV
Largest in Den Haag: VVD
2/5
(2 points):
Largest in Limburg: PVV
Largest in Zuid-Holland: VVD
Largest in Noord-Holland: VVD
Largest in Flevoland: VVD

Largest in Zeeland: CDA
Largest in Overijssel:CDA
Largest in Friesland: CDA

Largest in Groningen: SP
Largest in Drenthe: VVD
Largest in Noord-Brabant: VVD
Largest in Utrecht (province): VVD
Largest in Gelderland: VVD

22/24

(3 points):
PVV over or under 15.5% (2010 result)? Under
Predict the order of the following parties correctly: CDA, D66, GL? CDA-D66-GL
PVV over or under 30% in the municipality of Nissewaard? Slightly under
Best VVD municipality? Laren
Best CDA municipality? Tubbergen

Best PVV municipality? Kerkrade
Best GL municipality? Utrecht
Best D66 municipality? Wageningen
PvdA over or under 16% in Amsterdam? Under
PVV over or under 24% in Rotterdam? Under

PvdA over or under 10% in The Hague? Over
Predict the order of the following parties in The Hague correctly: VVD, D66, PVV. VVD-PVV-D66
PVV over or under 25% in Limburg? Under

Margin between VVD and PVV in Flevoland smaller or larger than 2 points? Smaller
DENK over or under 7% in The Hague? Under

33/45
(4 points)
Best FvD municipality? Scheveningen
Best DENK municipality? Amsterdam
Best VNL municipality? Scheveningen

Which of DENK, FvD, PP and VNL get in? FvD and DENK
4/16
61 out of 90 points
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,311
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1799 on: March 17, 2017, 01:23:25 PM »

lolpvdalol
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 95  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 9 queries.