Opinion of Kim Davis (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 10:50:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Kim Davis (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of Kim Davis
#1
Freedom Fighter
 
#2
Horrible Person
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 136

Author Topic: Opinion of Kim Davis  (Read 10305 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: September 05, 2015, 05:02:30 PM »

You know, the fact that she's an extreme socon and a Democrat doesn't surprise me so much in that part of the country, but the fact that she's an Apostolic and a Democrat DOES. Actually even if she was a Republican I'd be surprised that an Apostolic is holding public office, especially one like that.

For those unaware, Apostolics are a Pentecostal denomination that are mostly found only in Appalachia and the Upper South and yet for whatever reason also North Dakota, (there's a non-negligible population around Bismarck, I know the chiropractor I went to in high school was one, and the receptionist, his daughter was recognizable as one), that basically shun alcohol and tobacco, jewelry, tattoos, most modern clothing and forbid women from wearing pants (they view this as equivalent to crossdressing like men wearing dresses), and their women wear their hair waist long while men are prohibited from having long hair, if you ever thought she was dressed a little odd and archaicly that's why (and notice her hair in the pic above.) They also heavily discourage though I don't believe actually "ban" owning a TV and watching movies. Much like Jehova's Witnesses they tend to be very "anti-worldly" and having one be in charge of record keeping for a county is an odd position. Although worth noting part of the reason why they hold to that is that such jobs could put someone in a position where they must be an accessory to sin...which brings up a valid point here. By the logic of her church she should've resigned as soon as the Supreme Court decision came if not sooner. Though I'm sure her local congregation support her and all.

That's an interesting and unique bit of analysis. Thank you.

Personally, I think issuing a marriage license to a homosexual couple is akin to burning a bit of incense to Caesar. However, there's nothing in the Bible that says Caesar owes you a job. The appropriate response for her is to resign.

This is the wrong hill for the religious right to die on. There's already a reasonable way for her to avoid violating her conscience, and she is a civil servant, not a private business owner. If social conservatives are to carve out for themselves a niche for themselves in a world where they are increasingly viewed as bigoted, they must be very careful about which battles to fight.

Of course, it is very easy for me to say she should resign with my cushy private sector job.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2015, 03:13:56 PM »

Lean FF. I admire her bravery and believe she's a kindhearted person who is only doing this to please god, but she should just resign at this point. SSM is settled law.

We don't live in a theocracy. An elected official doing something contrary to his/her job to "please God" should not even be a thing.

HP, and the funny thing is she's an elected Democrat.

So is every single elected official in Rowan County, save the (elected!) jailer. What's your point?

Um, maybe its that Democrats full-heartedly embrace gay marriages and she's denying them. It just goes to show that local governments across the rural south still elect very conservative Democrats. Its like traveling through a time warp for some of these places.

It's worth pointing out that she's probably an open Republican on the presidential and statewide level. In many Mississippi and other rural Southern locales, the local offices (sheriffs, clerks, aldermen, etc.) are all elected on the Democratic Party line no matter what. If a local office holder wants to run for higher office, even legislature, they run as Republicans and nobody thinks of them as a party-switcher. It's just how the local elections are. It's not even "oh, they will still elect Democrats when they're conservative enough," it's "literally no one ever runs as a Republican for these local races, regardless of their actual identity."

I can't guarantee that Davis is like this, but she probably is.

So the obvious question is: Why don't people bother running for the GOP in local deep south races?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.