All these narrow polls for Murray ought to be a good sign for a certain Washington House candidate.
...Matt Larkin?
(Obviously you mean Kent, but that race was always predicated on the idea that it might scramble normal voting patterns. It seems like most of the evidence is that it's not doing so, but it wasn't a ridiculous suggestion at the start. Larkin is much more of a Generic R who is probably much more dependent on Generic R doing well if he wants to win his seat.)
I meant statehouse level. Look at who's the OP of this thread.
But yeah, Kent is definitely the best of the bunch of his sort of candidates running this cycle. He's really nailed down how to run in that lane.
