Are 'sore loser' laws undemocratic? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 01:04:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Are 'sore loser' laws undemocratic? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are 'sore loser' laws undemocratic?
#1
Yes.		  
#2
No.		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 46

Author Topic: Are 'sore loser' laws undemocratic?  (Read 906 times)
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,101
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61
« on: December 18, 2021, 02:35:23 PM »
I see primaries and generals as fundamentally different things. A primary is for a party to decide who represents them in a general election. A general is to decide who all the voters of that district want to represent them in Congress. A party choosing not to represent someone should not be a barrier to holding elected office.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.