Lowest landslide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 10:39:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Lowest landslide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is the least number of electoral votes which would be a landslide?
#1
335+
 
#2
345+
 
#3
360+
 
#4
380+
 
#5
425+
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Lowest landslide  (Read 4913 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: September 27, 2008, 02:45:34 PM »

When I hear "landslide," I think of FDR in 1932 and 1936, Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956, LBJ in 1964, Nixon in 1972, and Reagan in 1980 and 1984. The popular definition of a landslide seems to be around 350 EVs however, as most people consider Bush 88 and Clinton 92 and 96 to have been landslides.
Reagan in 1980? Lol. Certainly not landslide territory (and only barely wider than 88 and 96.)
Unless we take "landslide" back to its original meaning and take it to indicate *movement* (whether compared to the previous election or to expectations during the campaign.) In which case, 1992 certainly qualifies but 1936 doesn't... and 1980 and 1984 are of similar magnitude...

So yeah, whatever. This election won't be describable as one unless all the closeish Rep states flip, and won't be honestly describable as one, full stop.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.