MN: Rasmussen: Obama leads by 4% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:50:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MN: Rasmussen: Obama leads by 4% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MN: Rasmussen: Obama leads by 4%  (Read 2719 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« on: August 14, 2008, 06:37:54 PM »

This makes me laugh, so how much is the RNC paying Rasmussen now?

Again, then they must be paying SUSA and Qunnipiac as well.

Stop only believing polls you want to believe.

I don't believe any of the polls right now, One its summer and people don't care. Two VP haven't been picked and three its summer.
Josh was for polls before he was against them
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2008, 07:56:58 PM »

I love how the Obama people believed that he'd win MN by 15 points, and then when the polls show it tightening, they say it's a product of summer polling.
For the 100th time, when you know that in the end its not going to be good for you, clinging to hope in summertime polls is all you have.  I don't know if there are many people left that actually believe America is dumb enough (and yes they are dumb) to elect Obama
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2008, 08:26:57 PM »


You think this is a possible win but PA isn't? MN is the ultimate definition of a "stubborn" state for the GOP so you can't use that argument.
Are you forgetting the teaser known as NJ? Smiley
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2008, 09:32:42 PM »


You think this is a possible win but PA isn't? MN is the ultimate definition of a "stubborn" state for the GOP so you can't use that argument.
Are you forgetting the teaser known as NJ? Smiley

Except we won NJ since 1972. We haven't won MN since then.
Yea, but at least Minnesota gets Pawlenty and Coleman.  We haven't elected ANY Republicans since 1997
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.