No, the EPA should not be abolished, but some of its regulations are insane, its regulatory power is too much.
Like what for example? Do you want to see more marketable permit trading programs? And, how does the EPA have too much regulatory power? I don't really get that.
I am huge proponent of protecting the environment, and abolishing the EPA all together would be a set back, but I think the program should be reformed. There is a lot of red tape that agencies have to jump through to get a project going, a prime example of that is what we are seeing with South Coast Rail in Massachusetts, and that is a government program. A lot of money is spent with studies, and it takes years for a program to be approved by the EPA.
Poll
