Worst 20th century dictator? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 09:17:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Worst 20th century dictator? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Worst 20th century dictator?
#1
Stalin
 
#2
Hitler
 
#3
Mussolini
 
#4
Franco
 
#5
Kim Jong Il
 
#6
the guy from cambodia( sorry for my ignorance)
 
#7
Saddam
 
#8
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Worst 20th century dictator?  (Read 4880 times)
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« on: May 17, 2005, 12:27:38 PM »
« edited: May 17, 2005, 12:30:42 PM by Blue Rectangle »

Voted Stalin, but you should have included Mao as an option.  Stalin beats Mao for worst, but not by a lot.

Pol Pot is the name you were looking for.

Well, maybe I'm being a little hard on Mao.  Stalin killed 20+ million mostly through intent, Mao killed 20+ million mostly through stupidity.
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2005, 06:04:56 PM »

Stalin ruled 30 years. Hitler ruled 12 years. The absolute number of people murdered by Stalin is higher than the number murdered by Hitler. But the Hitler’s annual murdering rate was higher than Stalin’s. The main reason for the Stalin’s murders was his paranoia about these “anti Communist” people. The base for Hitler’s murders was the inferiority of the murdered people race. So who is winning this competition?
An interesting question.
Hitler's killings were both politically and racially based.  His main reason for hating the Jews was that they were seen a pro-communist.  Stalin's killings had as much of a ethnic aspect as Hitler's, as the Ukrainians (among others) suffered for their race as much as anything.  Both enjoyed slaughtering Poles.

My main reason for voting Stalin is that he tends to get soft treatment from communist apologists and from those who are simply ignorant of history (the "he fought Hitler, therefore he's an OK guy" view).
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2005, 11:13:27 AM »

The inclusion of Kim Jong Il with these freaks is laughable, btw.
He doesn't play anywhere near their league.

As for Jake, yes, you are. Tongue


Kim Il Sung would be a more suitable inclusion.

Or maybe Chavez?




(j/k)
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2005, 03:13:58 PM »

Gotta go with Pol Pot on this one.
If we go by measures based on killings per year and killings per population, then Pol Pot "wins" by a mile.

Based on what Putin has said recently about Stalin, though, I have to vote Stalin purely for opposition to this kind of thinking.
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2005, 12:48:20 PM »

I demand Salazar to be included. Tongue
Ken or John?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.