Luxembourg 2013 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 04:56:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Luxembourg 2013 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Luxembourg 2013  (Read 13306 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: July 15, 2013, 01:52:50 PM »

Quite hard to understand if you're not familiar with it or a similar dialect of German!

Isn't that true of any language, though? Tongue

Not quite. In fact, for me as a North German it is easier to understand Dutch than Letzeburgisch (or Schwizerdütsch, for that matter). For ZuWo, as a Swiss, it is obviously the other way round. The differences between German dialects, especially the North German (Low Saxon) and the Southwestern (Allemannic) ones are quite strong, with High German serving as a bridge.
While out here in the middle, Luxemburgish is, barely, sorta, with occasional gaps, understandable. While Swiss* and Dutch are not.

*okay, not quite true.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2013, 10:18:28 AM »

Reading more about the spying scandal that brought on these elections.

They bugged the Grand Duke?

Why?

Was it just that the Luxembourg intelligence services really don't have anything to do so they just started bugging every single person to occupy their time?
What makes you think there is a western world secret service that has done anything else with the sixtillions shoved down their throats since 9/11?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2013, 08:57:59 AM »
« Edited: October 20, 2013, 09:00:27 AM by Minion of Midas »

It seems that a list vote gives exactly one vote to each candidate on the list... if you change your ballot to vote for candidates from multiple lists, how many votes maximum can you give to a single candidate?

EDIT: Found it on the website. The answer is two.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2013, 09:21:20 AM »

That 2009 comparison figure is the whole municipality result (or if you click it at constituency level, the whole constituency result), so no worthwhile info on swings until any municipality is wholly in. Sad
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2013, 10:25:14 AM »
« Edited: October 20, 2013, 10:26:58 AM by Minion of Midas »

And we have a full result. (Tiny municipality alert!)

Waldbredimus, in the east.

CSV 41.2 (-4.9, and that's certainly not supported by partial results from elsewhere)
DP 17.8 (+7.3, ditto)
Greens 14.6 (-1.1)
LSAP 10.9 (-2.5)
ARD 6.8 (-2.9)
dei Lenk 3.8 (+0.8, these latter three look like they might hold all over)

EDIT: And another one, Remich. Just as tiny and in the same part of the country... and an even bigger CSV loss (35.2, -9.1), with LSAP as well as DP gaining.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2013, 11:00:07 AM »

Yeah, CSV definitely is losing quite a bit of votes, without their dominant party status getting into any kind of doubt of course.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2013, 09:53:06 AM »

Turnout: 90.0% (down from 90.8% in the last election)
Voting in Luxembourg is compulsory... and when you request a postal ballot, unless you're 75 or over, you need to give them a good reason and some proof of it.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2013, 02:08:19 PM »

The sky is falling! Cheesy
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2013, 02:18:43 PM »

Under pure proportional, the Pirates and Communists would have gained seats in the South. Alas, I think there is a 4% threshold within the constituencies.
I think they're just using D'Hondt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.