Future of Puerto Rico
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:35:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Future of Puerto Rico
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Poll
Question: What would you prefer
#1
Independent Country
 
#2
51st State
 
#3
Commonwealth
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 67

Author Topic: Future of Puerto Rico  (Read 13220 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: December 30, 2008, 09:41:23 AM »

^^That would be a fairly large state. And bundling the US Pacific trusts into another state would be roughly five more votes, creating two new fairly large states. I would say to go for it if the people approve.
No, even including the former trust territories (whose current independence is a scam anyways) that would still be three EVs. Unless you were including Hawaii.
Anyways American Samoa has less in common with Micronesia than, say, Florida with Alaska. Why not turn the continental 49 into a single state instead?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: December 30, 2008, 10:34:36 AM »

Puerto Rico is more populous than Wyoming, so, yes, it should be added as a state. How many electoral votes would it have, though?
I believe it would begin with an At-Large until the next census? And there would be one extra seat in Congress until the next redistricting.

I think that's what happened with Alaska and Hawaii right?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: December 30, 2008, 10:55:33 AM »

Puerto Rico is more populous than Wyoming, so, yes, it should be added as a state. How many electoral votes would it have, though?
I believe it would begin with an At-Large until the next census? And there would be one extra seat in Congress until the next redistricting.

I think that's what happened with Alaska and Hawaii right?
They were far smaller and were added very shortly before a Census (after which Hawaii gained the second seat that it's population would have entitled it to anyways). There may also have been a desire to keep the House's size an odd number during the interim.
Most states have been admitted with one Representative, but there have been exemptions for very populous new states before (Oklahoma off the top off my head, Texas almost certainly, possibly others).
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: December 30, 2008, 11:09:35 AM »

^I'm pretty sure Maine had 6-8 when it joined the union.
Micronesia is currently independent. I'm talking about Guam, northern Mariana Islands and the like. Islands that we currently possess.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: December 30, 2008, 11:13:05 AM »

^I'm pretty sure Maine had 6-8 when it joined the union.
Micronesia is currently independent. I'm talking about Guam, northern Mariana Islands and the like. Islands that we currently possess.
That is only Guam, the Northern Marianas, and American Samoa at the Pacific's other end. The Northern Marianas are the only part of the former Pacific Trust Territory (to which Guam never belonged, having been in US hands since 1898) to still be formally in US possession - practically it's a somewhat different matter. Four nominally sovereign countries were carved from the Territory: Palau, Kiribati, Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: December 30, 2008, 01:13:09 PM »

The combined population of those three territories stands at roughly 360,000. That's just short of Wyoming, still not that bad. And it gives voting rights to these people on a national level, a right they should've had to begin with.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: December 30, 2008, 01:17:10 PM »

The combined population of those three territories stands at roughly 360,000. That's just short of Wyoming, still not that bad. And it gives voting rights to these people on a national level, a right they should've had to begin with.
...and adding the four ex-trust countries, you get to a population to mirror the average single member (3 EV) state.
Although I still contend that American Samoa should not, under no circumstances, be lumped in with Micronesia.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: December 30, 2008, 01:23:53 PM »

We do not own Micronesia! I highly doubt that they will rejoin the union, so thus they will not be grouped with Samoa. There's not even a movement that I know of for us to regain the former trust territories. I'm recommending that we group our current Pacific possessions into a state.
Anyway, east and west Oregon are quite different, there's no requirement that a state has a unified culture.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: December 30, 2008, 01:28:12 PM »

We do not own Micronesia! I highly doubt that they will rejoin the union, so thus they will not be grouped with Samoa. There's not even a movement that I know of for us to regain the former trust territories. I'm recommending that we group our current Pacific possessions into a state.
While you should, perhaps, read up on the "Compact of Free Association", the Marianas are part of Micronesia (the world region, not the country) too.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Lol, not remotely comparable.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: December 30, 2008, 01:31:54 PM »

I thought you were suggesting annexing Micronesia (the country).
Is it a legal requirement that states have a unified culture? Nope. Native American groups inhabiting say, Wisconsin, may be very different in culture from the state at large, but Wisconsin stands as a state.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: December 30, 2008, 01:37:00 PM »

Statehood.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: December 30, 2008, 01:39:11 PM »

I thought you were suggesting annexing Micronesia (the country).
Well, I was contemplating the possibility - it makes more sense than throwing in East Samoa. It is a little unlikely, though - though certainly more likely than just about any other theoretically possible abolution of an independent country extant in the world right now (these things just don't happen any more. Good thing, too.)

Give Samoa back to the Samoans. Tongue



Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,556
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: January 01, 2009, 12:01:56 PM »

American Samoa is on the other side of the International Date Line of Guam and the NMI's, which combined with the cultural difference makes it a poor pick for being part of the state.  I'd suggest making Guam/NMI a state and offering annexation into that state to any of the trust territories (I bet they would all take it, but if they don't, fine).  American Samoa could be given the option of joining Hawaii, independence, or status quo.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: January 02, 2009, 01:57:38 PM »

).

On October 23, 2007, that Resources Committee unanimously approved a substitute bill of HR900, which establishes that before 2009, a first plebiscite will be held in which Puerto Ricans will be asked if they desire to maintain their territorial status, in a yes or no question. The bill states that should the No as the favored choice, either another plebiscite asking between statehood, independence or an associated republic, or a constitutional assembly would follow thereafter, by choice of the United States Federal Court of Puerto Rico. The bill is yet to be considered by the United States House of Representatives, waiting for enough votes to carry a debate. Several organizations in Puerto Rico, such as the Puerto Rico Lawyer's College, have pledged to lobby against it, in an effort to prevent the solution of the status issue.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2009, 11:44:51 PM »

I thought you were suggesting annexing Micronesia (the country).
Well, I was contemplating the possibility - it makes more sense than throwing in East Samoa. It is a little unlikely, though - though certainly more likely than just about any other theoretically possible abolution of an independent country extant in the world right now (these things just don't happen any more. Good thing, too.)

Give Samoa back to the Samoans. Tongue

Ablution? Isn't that the thing I do before prayer?
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: January 04, 2009, 12:17:40 AM »

).

On October 23, 2007, that Resources Committee unanimously approved a substitute bill of HR900, which establishes that before 2009, a first plebiscite will be held in which Puerto Ricans will be asked if they desire to maintain their territorial status, in a yes or no question. The bill states that should the No as the favored choice, either another plebiscite asking between statehood, independence or an associated republic, or a constitutional assembly would follow thereafter, by choice of the United States Federal Court of Puerto Rico. The bill is yet to be considered by the United States House of Representatives, waiting for enough votes to carry a debate. Several organizations in Puerto Rico, such as the Puerto Rico Lawyer's College, have pledged to lobby against it, in an effort to prevent the solution of the status issue.

I really hate how against finding a solution to this issue Puerto Rico appears to be.  I also hate how apathetic the U.S. Virgin Islands appear to be.  There's no discussion at all about whether they would like to be become a state or independent.  What's so appealing about being U.S. property?
In Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands it appears that the majority is in favor of statehood and while they would be a small state, I believe it is necessary that we find a solution to this problem once and for all.  I'm not sure what can be done about Samoa though.  They're too far from Hawaii or the Mariana Islands and too small to become a state.  Maybe we should just let them go?
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2009, 09:25:03 AM »

).

On October 23, 2007, that Resources Committee unanimously approved a substitute bill of HR900, which establishes that before 2009, a first plebiscite will be held in which Puerto Ricans will be asked if they desire to maintain their territorial status, in a yes or no question. The bill states that should the No as the favored choice, either another plebiscite asking between statehood, independence or an associated republic, or a constitutional assembly would follow thereafter, by choice of the United States Federal Court of Puerto Rico. The bill is yet to be considered by the United States House of Representatives, waiting for enough votes to carry a debate. Several organizations in Puerto Rico, such as the Puerto Rico Lawyer's College, have pledged to lobby against it, in an effort to prevent the solution of the status issue.

I really hate how against finding a solution to this issue Puerto Rico appears to be.  I also hate how apathetic the U.S. Virgin Islands appear to be.  There's no discussion at all about whether they would like to be become a state or independent.  What's so appealing about being U.S. property?
In Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands it appears that the majority is in favor of statehood and while they would be a small state, I believe it is necessary that we find a solution to this problem once and for all.  I'm not sure what can be done about Samoa though.  They're too far from Hawaii or the Mariana Islands and too small to become a state.  Maybe we should just let them go?
Actually, Puerto Rico's support for statehood has consistently risen for the past few years. It is now well over 50%. The Pro-statehood party there just gained 48/68 of the "Senate" seats on the island, and the Governor's mansion.
We should probably chuck the Virgin islands in with Puerto Rico, as they're fairly close together. Samoa is an issue. We could ask Micronesia if they would like to be annexed, but that would be a foreign policy nightmare.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,811


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: January 05, 2009, 08:49:56 AM »

).

On October 23, 2007, that Resources Committee unanimously approved a substitute bill of HR900, which establishes that before 2009, a first plebiscite will be held in which Puerto Ricans will be asked if they desire to maintain their territorial status, in a yes or no question. The bill states that should the No as the favored choice, either another plebiscite asking between statehood, independence or an associated republic, or a constitutional assembly would follow thereafter, by choice of the United States Federal Court of Puerto Rico. The bill is yet to be considered by the United States House of Representatives, waiting for enough votes to carry a debate. Several organizations in Puerto Rico, such as the Puerto Rico Lawyer's College, have pledged to lobby against it, in an effort to prevent the solution of the status issue.

I really hate how against finding a solution to this issue Puerto Rico appears to be.  I also hate how apathetic the U.S. Virgin Islands appear to be.  There's no discussion at all about whether they would like to be become a state or independent.  What's so appealing about being U.S. property?
In Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands it appears that the majority is in favor of statehood and while they would be a small state, I believe it is necessary that we find a solution to this problem once and for all.  I'm not sure what can be done about Samoa though.  They're too far from Hawaii or the Mariana Islands and too small to become a state.  Maybe we should just let them go?
Actually, Puerto Rico's support for statehood has consistently risen for the past few years. It is now well over 50%. The Pro-statehood party there just gained 48/68 of the "Senate" seats on the island, and the Governor's mansion.
We should probably chuck the Virgin islands in with Puerto Rico, as they're fairly close together. Samoa is an issue. We could ask Micronesia if they would like to be annexed, but that would be a foreign policy nightmare.

The small population and remote location are problems for Guam. Even with the addition of the Northern Marianas the population would be a little over half the population of WY. The issues of 2 Senators and 3 EV for a state that small would be a barrier for many. OTOH, it would be difficult to see it annexed to HI given the great distance to that state.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: January 05, 2009, 03:23:21 PM »

That is true, but what say you to offering annexation to several of our former trust territories?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: January 05, 2009, 04:36:36 PM »

).

On October 23, 2007, that Resources Committee unanimously approved a substitute bill of HR900, which establishes that before 2009, a first plebiscite will be held in which Puerto Ricans will be asked if they desire to maintain their territorial status, in a yes or no question. The bill states that should the No as the favored choice, either another plebiscite asking between statehood, independence or an associated republic, or a constitutional assembly would follow thereafter, by choice of the United States Federal Court of Puerto Rico. The bill is yet to be considered by the United States House of Representatives, waiting for enough votes to carry a debate. Several organizations in Puerto Rico, such as the Puerto Rico Lawyer's College, have pledged to lobby against it, in an effort to prevent the solution of the status issue.

I really hate how against finding a solution to this issue Puerto Rico appears to be.  I also hate how apathetic the U.S. Virgin Islands appear to be.  There's no discussion at all about whether they would like to be become a state or independent.  What's so appealing about being U.S. property?
In Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands it appears that the majority is in favor of statehood and while they would be a small state, I believe it is necessary that we find a solution to this problem once and for all.  I'm not sure what can be done about Samoa though.  They're too far from Hawaii or the Mariana Islands and too small to become a state.  Maybe we should just let them go?
Actually, Puerto Rico's support for statehood has consistently risen for the past few years. It is now well over 50%. The Pro-statehood party there just gained 48/68 of the "Senate" seats on the island, and the Governor's mansion.
We should probably chuck the Virgin islands in with Puerto Rico, as they're fairly close together. Samoa is an issue. We could ask Micronesia if they would like to be annexed, but that would be a foreign policy nightmare.

The PPD incumbent Governor was extremely unpopular due to a number of scandals. I think the PNP numbers in the recent elections are a bit inflated due to that.
Logged
aaaa2222
yoman82
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 305


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: January 06, 2009, 03:53:58 PM »

That is true, but even so, PNP gained far over a majority in the election.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: June 28, 2009, 04:23:27 AM »

51st state then we can add Baja, Sonora et al and work our way down south from there.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: June 28, 2009, 06:30:33 AM »

51st state then we can add Baja, Sonora et al and work our way down south from there.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: June 28, 2009, 07:07:23 AM »

Let the leaches go, it's long past due.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,556
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: June 28, 2009, 04:17:54 PM »

Let the leaches go, it's long past due.
Racist much?

The only fair answer is to let them become a state.  It's time they received representation (and paid taxes).
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.