Should soldiers be allowed to hire prostitutes? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:30:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should soldiers be allowed to hire prostitutes? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should soldiers be allowed to hire prostitutes?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Should soldiers be allowed to hire prostitutes?  (Read 4190 times)
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

« on: October 26, 2005, 01:22:53 PM »

No. Now when on leave, that's different. But while stationed somewhere the focus is on the job, not play time. Soldiers don't piss around, that's not their job. If they have free time, pursue education or the many, many other worthwhile options that are available. Allowing that kind of behavior is too risky in a lot of ways.
Logged
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2005, 12:12:33 PM »

No. Now when on leave, that's different. But while stationed somewhere the focus is on the job, not play time. Soldiers don't piss around, that's not their job. If they have free time, pursue education or the many, many other worthwhile options that are available. Allowing that kind of behavior is too risky in a lot of ways.

Hahhah - risky!  Compared to getting shot at!  What a joke.

Of course they should be allowed to, as anyone should.  But particularly soldiers, who are about to die, should at least be allowed to get laid.  Anyone who doesn't understand the age-old relationship between the military and prostitution really doesn't understand either the military character or ordinary human desire.

What do you think soldiers go to basic training for? To have beer parties, hang out in the garage...?

And then there are the many, many soldiers who aren't even around combat.
Logged
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2005, 03:45:15 PM »
« Edited: October 27, 2005, 03:53:51 PM by Giant Saguaro »

No. Now when on leave, that's different. But while stationed somewhere the focus is on the job, not play time. Soldiers don't piss around, that's not their job. If they have free time, pursue education or the many, many other worthwhile options that are available. Allowing that kind of behavior is too risky in a lot of ways.

Hahhah - risky!  Compared to getting shot at!  What a joke.

Of course they should be allowed to, as anyone should.  But particularly soldiers, who are about to die, should at least be allowed to get laid.  Anyone who doesn't understand the age-old relationship between the military and prostitution really doesn't understand either the military character or ordinary human desire.

What do you think soldiers go to basic training for? To have beer parties, hang out in the garage...?

What the devil does basic training have to do with this issue?  Are you suggesting they can be trained not to have sexual desires?  Perhaps you'ld like to put saltpeter in their food or castrate them in some fashion?

Nope. You just don't understand.

In addition to what Joe said, soldiers are trained to handle themselves in a fire fight. All that stuff you think is really cool would be one major distraction to a soldier.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.