Will Obama have to call in the National Guard to enforce the gay marriage ruling? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 11:47:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Will Obama have to call in the National Guard to enforce the gay marriage ruling? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will the National Guard be necessary?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: Will Obama have to call in the National Guard to enforce the gay marriage ruling?  (Read 5211 times)
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« on: June 19, 2015, 06:57:12 PM »

Yes. Among the 15 states that don't have full ssm legalization:

Alabama and Kansas will continue to ignore the rulings

MS/LA/TX/NE might ignore SCOTUS

MI/OH/KY/TN/GA/SD/ND/MO/AR will likely comply with SCOTUS.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2015, 07:49:22 PM »

If Oklahoma didn't go the nullification route, I doubt even Alabama will.

Alabama is already on the nullification route. I highly doubt they will suddenly change just because a few more justices tell them to do so.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2015, 07:35:45 PM »

So far, the answer appears to be:

Yes for LA and KS
Potential Yes for TX and MS
No for all other states
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2015, 08:53:11 PM »

Threaten to withhold federal funds for highway projects... then that will stop it.

That would not stop TX - unlike most states, TX sends more to Washington in taxes than the amount of federal funding it receives - i.e. TX does not need federal funding to survive. However, it would bankrupt AL/MS/LA/KS.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2015, 08:16:04 PM »

At this point, the answer is:

Yes for Kentucky, Texas, Alabama
Potential Yes for Arkansas (only 1 county is resisting thus far, so not really worthy of federal intervention)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.