Gallup Daily Tracking Poll Thread

[Eraserhead]

Gallup and Rasmussen are hilariously showing entirely different trends.

[Eraserhead]

Kewl.

[Eraserhead]

That last one feels like an outlier though...

How so?

[Eraserhead]

I'm actually starting to warm up to an Obama vs. McCain race. Ohio seems extremely anti-Obama here...and I'm confident of victory here and in Florida.

Remember...for two weeks straight....Obama campaigned in Ohio non-stop....played ads every minute on TV and radio...sent flyers in the mail (including mine)....had a good debate performance in Cleveland....and the mainstream media painted it as a major "Clinton vs. Obama" battle with Obama's unstoppable momentum.



There's his great showing of losing by 11pts.

Why do you keep saying it was 11 points? It was 10 points friend.

[Eraserhead]

Back in the lead... it feels so right.

[Eraserhead]

Nice.

[Eraserhead]

It looks like "small town gate" is having a devastating impact.

[Eraserhead]

I kind of expected this would have absolutely no impact.

[Eraserhead]

I kind of expected this would have absolutely no impact.

That's a slightly premature reaction, to say the least.

Eh... I guess.

[Eraserhead]

I'm enjoying Obama's "bittergate" bump. I guess people are finally getting tired of MSM insulting their intelligence.

[Eraserhead]

Obama Support Among "Bitter" Voters Unchanged" (April 16, 2008)

No decline in support among low-income, low-education, religious Democrats

http://www.gallup.com/poll/106561/Obama-Support-Among-Bitter-Voters-Unchanged.aspx

Dave

lol. haha!

Sorry, had to get my hack on for a second there.

[Eraserhead]

Democrats leading McCain in "Purple" States (April 17, 2008)

Hold 47% to 43% leads in states decided by five points or less in 2004

http://www.gallup.com/poll/106579/Democrats-Leading-McCain-Purple-States.aspx

Dave

I wish they just gave us polls from each state.

Actually, then again knowing Gallup, maybe not.

[Eraserhead]

Clinton - 46%
Obama - 45%

Woah.

Woah what?

[Eraserhead]

If anything, he's probably taken a slight hit from the debate. I wouldn't expect it to last though.

[Eraserhead]

Rise up!

[Eraserhead]

I hope this is a trend. We need a permanent shift of national polls towards Obama to make the case that he is unelectable. And then Hillary can come in and win the nomination. This is a good start.

Yeah and then we get to watch Denver burn.

[Eraserhead]

The black man regains the lead!

[Eraserhead]

Gallup is just strange.

[Eraserhead]

Gallup is just strange.

Gallup is Gallup and certainly not a model in the polling business (cfr 2004).

For word.

[Eraserhead]

Clinton seems to be doing better against McCain than Obama is against McCain.

In the tracking polls, she tends to be

Correction: in tracking polls, normal national polls and aggregates of state polls, she tends to be ahead.

Oh... would those be the national polls that show what you like?

[Eraserhead]

That's because working class whites don't like the guy.  He'll win the nomination but why should that effect whether that group likes him or not.

Hillary was a slam dunk to be the next president.  He won primaries in Jan, Feb, and early March back when he was the messiah.  Boy, those were the days.  Feinting and swooning crowds who cheered even when he sneezed.  No Rev Wright crawling out of the closet, no stories about radical friends, nobody recording his remarks to San Francisco fundraisers.  Those were indeed the days.

Obama might yet be elected, but Hillary was a sure thing.  Obama is a lot more iffy.

Hillary was a sure thing? Please.