1964 Party Nominations
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 01:21:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1964 Party Nominations		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Poll
Question: Despite the size of the list, there are really like five or six actual choices.
#1
Republican Nomination:President Margaret Chase Smith (Republican-Maine)		  
#2
Republican Nomination: Senator Barry M. Goldwater (Republican-Arizona)		  
#3
Republican Nomination: Governor Nelson Rockefeller (Republican-New York)		  
#4
Republican Nomination: Governor James A. Rhodes (Republican-Ohio)		  
#5
Republican Nomination: Ambassador to the U.N. Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. (Republican-Massachusetts)		  
#6
Republican Nomination: Congressman John W. Byrnes (Republican-Wisconsin)		  
#7
Republican Nomination: Governor William Warren Scranton (Republican-Pennsylvania)		  
#8
Republican Nomination: Senator Richard M. Nixon (Republican-California)		  
#9
Republican Nomination: Governor George W. Romney (Republican-Michigan)		  
#10
Republican Nomination: Senator Hiram Fong (Republican-Hawaii)		  
#11
Republican Nomination: Congressman Walter Judd (Republican-Minnesota)		  
#12
Democratic Nomination: Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat-Texas)		  
#13
Democratic Nomination: Governor George Wallace (Democrat-Alabama)		  
#14
Democratic Nomination: Senator John F. Kennedy (Democrat-Massachusetts)		  
#15
Democratic Nomination: Senator John W. Reynolds (Democrat-Wisconsin)		  
#16
Democratic Nomination: Mr. Albert S. Porter (Democrat-Ohio)		  
#17
Democratic Nomination: Governor Matthew E. Walsh (Democrat-Indiana)		  
#18
Democratic Nomination: Senator Daniel Brewster (Democrat-Maryland)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 54

Author Topic: 1964 Party Nominations  (Read 4791 times)
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 01, 2013, 04:09:42 PM »
Goldwater
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 01, 2013, 04:10:26 PM »
I want kennedy
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2013, 04:12:51 PM »
Quote from: Ugh. on April 01, 2013, 04:00:34 PM
How is he going to explain electing a super racist and a black guy?

Wallace/William L. Dawson.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,186
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 01, 2013, 04:22:14 PM »
Quote from: Vice Chair SJoyce on April 01, 2013, 04:12:51 PM
Quote from: Ugh. on April 01, 2013, 04:00:34 PM
How is he going to explain electing a super racist and a black guy?

Wallace/William L. Dawson.

Wallace/King!
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 01, 2013, 04:35:44 PM »

Or just write-in: MLK. Hey, if he's President he might not be assassinated anyways.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 01, 2013, 04:41:51 PM »
LBJ/McGovern
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 01, 2013, 04:58:29 PM »
If this ends up being Chase/Johnson, unpledged '64!
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 01, 2013, 05:01:36 PM »

^^^^

Humphrey for veep, to flip the 1960 ticket around. Wink
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 01, 2013, 05:02:19 PM »
Also, if Smith is renominated, Goldwater for VP!
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,186
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 01, 2013, 05:05:56 PM »
Quote from: Vice Chair SJoyce on April 01, 2013, 04:58:29 PM
If this ends up being Chase/Johnson, unpledged '64!

Let's work to make that unpledged ticket MLK/Wallace!
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: April 01, 2013, 05:10:48 PM »
Goldwasser
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: April 01, 2013, 05:22:09 PM »
Voted Smith, undecided who I'll vote for in the general.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM »
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: April 01, 2013, 05:30:41 PM »
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

ViEtNaM!!!!1111one
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: April 01, 2013, 05:32:35 PM »
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

Don't be willfully dense. You know why.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: April 01, 2013, 05:33:53 PM »
« Edited: April 01, 2013, 05:36:08 PM by Supersonic »
I was going to vote for Nelson Rockefeller as I felt he would be the most electable, Goldwater simply can't win. Although reading the lovely write up at the beginning of the thread made me go for President Chase instead.

Edit: Reading through the comments I get the feeling Chase will lose. Sad
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: April 01, 2013, 05:34:38 PM »
Quote from: Sewer on April 01, 2013, 05:32:35 PM
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

Don't be willfully dense. You know why.

I don't think any of the other Democrats would handle Vietnam any differently.
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: April 01, 2013, 05:37:04 PM »
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Sewer on April 01, 2013, 05:32:35 PM
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

Don't be willfully dense. You know why.

I don't think any of the other Democrats would handle Vietnam any differently.

LBJ wanted to be a 100% domestic president.  His handling of Vietnam was pretty much what he thought JFK would do.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2013, 05:38:52 PM »
Vietnam policy was a national consensus up to 1967-68. And even by 1968, most Democrats supported it.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: April 01, 2013, 05:41:15 PM »
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Sewer on April 01, 2013, 05:32:35 PM
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

Don't be willfully dense. You know why.

I don't think any of the other Democrats would handle Vietnam any differently.

That's the problem.

Quote from: Californian Tony on April 01, 2013, 05:38:52 PM
Vietnam policy was a national consensus up to 1967-68. And even by 1968, most Democrats supported it.

That's the problem.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: April 01, 2013, 05:45:27 PM »
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Sewer on April 01, 2013, 05:32:35 PM
Quote from: Lief on April 01, 2013, 05:28:38 PM
What is with all the leftist opposition to LBJ? He's the clear choice here.

Don't be willfully dense. You know why.

I don't think any of the other Democrats would handle Vietnam any differently.

Then we find someone who would. Unpledged.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: April 01, 2013, 05:51:06 PM »
Also if people had followed my suggestion to have Morse run for VP we would have a Democrat who would handle Vietnam differently.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: April 01, 2013, 06:22:14 PM »
Goldwater/Morse.  Let's have the most incoherent tickets possible!
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: April 01, 2013, 06:25:31 PM »
Actual vote: Welsh/Morse
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: April 01, 2013, 06:37:06 PM »
Wayne Morse/Barry Goldwater vs. George Wallace/Martin Luther King, Jr. vs. LBJ/Lodge!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.