Prediction: MS Gov. Primary Tues. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 01:11:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Prediction: MS Gov. Primary Tues. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Prediction: MS Gov. Primary Tues.  (Read 6443 times)
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« on: August 06, 2019, 11:33:04 PM »

I voted this morning.

I think Reeves will avoid a runoff but it’ll be close.  Something like 53-38-9.  Reeves will run strong in South MS, Rankin Co and Tupelo/NE.  Waller will do better in Hinds/Madison, the Delta and College Counties.  AG primary seems very unpredictable too.  I’ll predict wins for McRae, Watson as well (sadly).  

Hood could fall into a runoff but his name recognition + high Democratic balloting by North MS whites should get him >55%.

Why did you expect Waller to do well in Hinds/Madison but not Rankin?

Reeves is from Rankin, and it is generally considered the most “conservative” of the Metro Jackson counties.  

Waller winning it is the story of the night (thus far).  

I prefer the term “new money.”
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2019, 11:56:00 PM »

Deborah Dawkins got primaried. As did Jeff Smith.

Sounds like Dawkins opponent was AA and she didn’t campaign much.
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2019, 11:59:29 PM »

Not a lot of precinct results out but Waller carried NE JXN with like 80% of the vote.

In Forrest, Waller did well in Hattiesburg but did poorly in Petal + rural areas.
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2019, 03:41:39 PM »

Just messing around with some numbers in my head...

Waller's base is more motivated, so he get's 70% of his August 6 vote in the runoff.

Reeves' base is more marginal and he relied more on name recognition on August 6, so let's say he gets 55% of his August 6 turnoff.

40% of Foster's August 6 voters turn-out again for the runoff, and let's be generous and assume they break 60-40 for Waller.

Results:

Tate Reeves:  111,268 votes (51.9%)
Bill Waller: 103,240 votes (48.1%)

This is probably Waller's best case scenario.

I think you're vastly underestimating turnout. In your scenario, turnout drops about 45%. I think it decreases by about 10-12%.

Waller's path, which is obviously a longshot, is 1) 100% of his voters show back up, 2) 80% of Reeves show back up, 3) 100% of Foster voters show back up and break 2-1 for Waller. That gets Waller to 50.1% and a win under 1,000 voters.



Of course, this gives you absurd results like Waller nearly winning DeSoto and Tate after doing very poorly there on 8/6. But it'll take something like that happening for him to win. That or massively overperforming there in Jackson (75% in Hinds/Madison, 60% in Rankin).
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2019, 01:21:19 PM »

56-44 Reeves.
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2019, 07:27:35 PM »

Reeves winning precincts that Taggart is winning doesn't bode well for Waller.
Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2019, 02:00:05 AM »

Logged
gespb19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 425
United States


« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2019, 01:39:14 AM »

Reeves was also endorsed by a ton of mayors on the Gulf Coast.

That area isn't as educated as you'd think. Same with DeSoto. Lot of OOS people there by Mississippi standards. Part of Waller's appeal is his family's history within the state. That isn't as big of a deal to people that aren't from here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 9 queries.