Reuters/Ipsos: Peters +5 in MI, TIED in NC (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 02:01:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  Reuters/Ipsos: Peters +5 in MI, TIED in NC (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters/Ipsos: Peters +5 in MI, TIED in NC  (Read 1357 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


« on: October 20, 2020, 03:03:22 PM »
« edited: October 20, 2020, 03:37:47 PM by TiltsAreUnderrated »

October 14-20
Changes with October 7-13

MI
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w4_10_20_2020.pdf

686 likely voters
MoE: 4.3% for likely voters

Peters 50% (-2)
James 45% (+1)
Some other candidate 3% (+1)
Would not vote 0% (n/c)
Not sure/prefer not to answer 2% (n/c)

NC
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_north_carolina_state_poll_w4_10_20_20.pdf

660 likely voters
MoE: 4.3% for likely voters

Cunningham 47% (+1)
Tillis 47% (+5)
Some other candidate 3% (-2)
Would not vote 0% (n/c)
Not sure/prefer not to answer 3% (-4)
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2020, 03:10:18 PM »

Thank God for Theresa Greenfield. While I still think Cal will pull it out in the end, I think it is pretty clear that Iowa is seat #50 and NC is seat #51 now (ME is 49).

No, it isn't. The conventional wisdom shouldn't have shifted so hard against Cunningham just because of:

- This one legitimately bad survey for him
- An ECU poll dropping and showing him actually improving (but people forgetting that the ECU surveys have always been bad for him)
- The first ABC/WaPo poll showing him running even with Biden while Tillis ran behind Trump

Yet, it has.

It's not clear to me how durable either Greenfield's or Cunningham's/Tillis' overperformance is, but Biden is in a stronger position in NC and partisanship alone should make the fundamentals easier for Cunningham. Perhaps Greenfield is in a better position, but there's plenty of room for doubt there (because there are fewer IA polls to begin with) and personally I think IASEN will still see a better performance for Republicans.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2020, 03:38:35 PM »

I've updated my post with details from fuller releases, which can be found here for MI and here for NC.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.