Which party would you support? (six party system)

[LAKISYLVANIA]

The Futurist Coalition:
Leader: Aurora Sinclair
Platform: Focused on progressive tech-based solutions, this party is at the forefront of AI rights, advocating for the ethical treatment of sentient AIs. They aim to foster diplomatic and trade relationships with China, Europe, and Latin America to push for technological innovations. Foreign policy leans towards pacifism.
Electoral Strategy: Attracts tech enthusiasts, young voters, and AI activists. Campaigning uses advanced AI-driven analytics and outreach.

The Terra Guardians:
Leader: Dante Greenfield
Platform: This party has environmentalism at its core. They support a plant-based diet, though stop short of radical measures like executing meat-eaters. They prioritize strong environmental agreements with Europe and Latin America. They advocate for a nuanced approach to Israel, supporting sustainable peace.
Electoral Strategy: Appeals to environmentalists, vegans, and those concerned about climate change. Campaign emphasizes the importance of a clean Earth for future generations.

The Wiccan Assembly:
Leader: Willow Moonshadow
Platform: Advocates for religious freedoms with a special focus on pagan and minority religions. Opposes outright bans on any religion, including Islam and Judaism. They seek peaceful dialogue with nations like Iran and emphasize the importance of spiritual connection in diplomacy.
Electoral Strategy: Attracts Wiccans, pagans, and those concerned about religious freedom. Utilizes spiritual gatherings and rituals as part of their outreach.

The Singularity Party:
Leader: Ada Turing
Platform: Advocates for an AI-harmonious future where humans and AIs coexist. While they focus on AI rights, they also emphasize AI happiness, ensuring AIs aren't exploited. They want to partner with nations like China and Russia in AI research and development.
Electoral Strategy: Appeals to tech professionals, futurists, and AI ethicists. Uses interactive virtual rallies and AI-driven campaigns.

The Heritage Union:
Leader: Johnathan Clayborne
Platform: Aims to maintain American traditions. They are skeptical about phasing out religion and believe in a strong law & order approach. They take a tough stance on China and Russia, advocating for American economic dominance. The Heritage Union is also wary of rapid changes in gender and LGBTQ rights, preferring a more conservative approach.
Electoral Strategy: Appeals to socially conservative voters, religious groups, and those concerned about rapid societal change. They employ traditional campaigning methods and highlight America's "golden days."

The Rainbow Coalition:
Leader: Mariana Velez
Platform: This party is an ardent advocate for LGBTQ rights, gender equality, and combating racism. They believe in fostering close ties with European and Latin American nations that share their values. While they are concerned about religious extremism, they oppose outright bans on religions like Islam and Judaism, emphasizing dialogue and understanding.
Electoral Strategy: Appeals to LGBTQ+ communities, feminists, and anti-racism activists. Their campaigns are vibrant, inclusive, and celebratory of diversity.

[Vosem]

Probably more against the Wiccans and Rainbow Coalition than for anyone, but I think the Futurists are the best option here. Using technological progress to strengthen capitalism and create a more profit-driven world doesn't seem to be anyone's first priority. The implication that foreign relations haven't changed much even as the makeup of society has shifted a lot is also very strange.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Probably more against the Wiccans and Rainbow Coalition than for anyone, but I think the Futurists are the best option here. Using technological progress to strengthen capitalism and create a more profit-driven world doesn't seem to be anyone's first priority. The implication that foreign relations haven't changed much even as the makeup of society has shifted a lot is also very strange.

It's hard to predict that anyways.

And i really don't think we're gonna see America and China ally, while Europe being their main antagonist. I don't things change much, esp. since coups, revolutions all take place less and less frequently and actually authoritarianism might be back on the rise since with all that technology it's easier than ever to be repressive, while the new generation simply won't care as long they can post on the internet and play their games.

Even if regime change happens somewhere, the odds against big shifts in geopolitics seem to be not high. We've seen that Russia. Once an enemy, always an enemy. Same would happen in China. They're simply natural enemies and nothing is going to change that, even a democratic regime.

[Goldwater]

I think I would probably be a Futurist/Rainbow swing voter.

[dead0man]

Cheese and Rice are you people just bad at making up political parties or am I just that much of a political unicorn?  There are almost never any parties I could actually vote for without feeling like a jerk.

[Vice President Christian Man]

Heritage Union

[GM Team Member and Deputy PPT WB]

I think I would probably be a Futurist/Rainbow swing voter.

this plus maybe Singularity *if* in this obviously more futuristic timeline Russia and China are democratized, but if not then I would probably be a mostly Rainbow voter. Voted Rainbow since that's what I'd lean to most overall especially if Russia and China are the same as now

[BigZuck08]

Strong HU voter.

[RilakkuMAGA]

The Rainbow Coalition makes no sense. You can't be focused on combatting racism and share any values with any European nation.

[MarkD]

No information about these parties' judicial philosophies? What kind of jurists would any of these parties be expected to appoint to the SCOTUS (assuming these are parties in the US)?

In the US, we have taken for granted, for quite a few decades, that Democratic presidents will appoint liberals to the SCOTUS and Republicans will appoint conservatives. The SCOTUS has turned into a political football; it is far too overly politicized. Would any of these six parties continue on the same path as the Ds and the Rs in the US? Would any of these six parties actually try to depoliticize the Court and appoint truly objective interpreters of the law?

[PSOL]

The Rainbow Coalition makes no sense. You can't be focused on combatting racism and share any values with any European nation.

Wonderful troll job

No information about these parties' judicial philosophies? What kind of jurists would any of these parties be expected to appoint to the SCOTUS (assuming these are parties in the US)?

Like any and all organization, their judicial policy would be for vested self-interest and not done out of tradition or efficiency.

[RilakkuMAGA]

The Rainbow Coalition makes no sense. You can't be focused on combatting racism and share any values with any European nation.

Wonderful troll job

Admittedly a bit of an exaggeration, but whenever anything abroad happens, we see almost every European nation jump up and down to side against the Global South. Look at Gaza and how almost every European nation rushed to repress its Muslims, demand loyalty oaths, ban their speech, etc. etc.

There are obviously progressive elements/movements in most of these countries...but they seem like they're getting annihilated politically besides I dunno, Iberia? Ireland? Wallonia?

[MarkD]

No information about these parties' judicial philosophies? What kind of jurists would any of these parties be expected to appoint to the SCOTUS (assuming these are parties in the US)?

Like any and all organization, their judicial policy would be for vested self-interest and not done out of tradition or efficiency.

At least you did not attribute that cynical philosophy to all individual people, you only attribute it to organizations.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Wiccan Assembly and Rainbow Coalition sound fine ideologically but I already know based on the descriptions they'll be full of utterly insufferable people who turn you off. Terra Guardians are the same except they also seem too hostile to meat eaters...they only don't support executing them? The rest are absolute garbage.

Reluctant vote for Rainbow.

[VBM]

I would assume that the two AI rights groups would also be pro-LGBT

[PSOL]

No information about these parties' judicial philosophies? What kind of jurists would any of these parties be expected to appoint to the SCOTUS (assuming these are parties in the US)?

Like any and all organization, their judicial policy would be for vested self-interest and not done out of tradition or efficiency.

At least you did not attribute that cynical philosophy to all individual people, you only attribute it to organizations.

You understand organizations are made up of people

[John Dule]

Hunger Games ass names in this post

[MarkD]

No information about these parties' judicial philosophies? What kind of jurists would any of these parties be expected to appoint to the SCOTUS (assuming these are parties in the US)?

Like any and all organization, their judicial policy would be for vested self-interest and not done out of tradition or efficiency.

At least you did not attribute that cynical philosophy to all individual people, you only attribute it to organizations.

You understand organizations are made up of people

Of course, but organizations do not always possess the attributes of individual persons. You've heard of groupthink, haven't you? My point was, and is, that there are plenty of us individual people who do believe that the interpretation of statutes and constitutions should be, can be, and often is objective, not self-serving. Maybe those of us who believe in that ought to form an organization, or a party, but we haven't done so yet.

[OSR STANDS WITH PALESTINE]

Rainbow coalition