Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 11:27:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18]
Author Topic: Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in  (Read 50186 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #425 on: August 09, 2006, 05:01:36 PM »

Standing right behind Lamont on stage were the Democrats' two greatest hangers on who like to get their faces into every liberal photo op imaginable, race baiter Al Sharpton and moral hypocrite Jesse Jackson.

Lamont, Sharpton, Jackson, Pelosi, the new face of the Democratic Party.

^^^

im sure michael moore and cindy sheehan were thrilled also!
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #426 on: August 09, 2006, 05:08:51 PM »

Funny i don't see you guys wringing your hands and boohooing over Tim Walberg in Michigan.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #427 on: August 09, 2006, 05:38:49 PM »

Standing right behind Lamont on stage were the Democrats' two greatest hangers on who like to get their faces into every liberal photo op imaginable, race baiter Al Sharpton and moral hypocrite Jesse Jackson.

Lamont, Sharpton, Jackson, Pelosi, the new face of the Democratic Party.
The party's finally going places!
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #428 on: August 09, 2006, 05:45:20 PM »

To Hymietown.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #429 on: August 09, 2006, 10:03:45 PM »

Standing right behind Lamont on stage were the Democrats' two greatest hangers on who like to get their faces into every liberal photo op imaginable, race baiter Al Sharpton and moral hypocrite Jesse Jackson.

Lamont, Sharpton, Jackson, Pelosi, the new face of the Democratic Party.

Don't forget Maxine Waters.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #430 on: August 09, 2006, 10:07:09 PM »

To argue these people are the face of the party is quite absurd. That makes about as much sense as chastising Bush for having received the support of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. Just because person X supports candidate Y's campaign does not mean candidate Y is equivalent to X or even necessarily very close to X politically.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #431 on: August 09, 2006, 10:08:56 PM »

Pat Robertson, Rich Santorum, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Sam Brownback, Vernon Robinson, Ann Coulter...

The new faces of the Republican party!!
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #432 on: August 09, 2006, 10:09:28 PM »

To argue these people are the face of the party is quite absurd. That makes about as much sense as chastising Bush for having received the support of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. Just because person X supports candidate Y's campaign does not mean candidate Y is equivalent to X or even necessarily very close to X politically.

Well you know, I like to say that they are....Tongue

Actually, though, I find support for a candidate from people like Sharpton, Jackson, Waters, etc. to be repellant.

You really can't argue that Nancy Pelosi is a big part of the party's public face.  She even appears in DNC commercials.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #433 on: August 09, 2006, 10:10:22 PM »

Pat Robertson, Rich Santorum, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Sam Brownback, Vernon Robinson, Ann Coulter...

The new faces of the Republican party!!

They're part of the picture, just a Sharpton, Jackson and Waters are on the Democratic side.

But remember that O'Reilly is an independent.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #434 on: August 09, 2006, 10:11:32 PM »

But remember that O'Reilly is an independent.

Sure he is. And Fox News is fair and balanced.....
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #435 on: August 09, 2006, 10:14:04 PM »

To argue these people are the face of the party is quite absurd. That makes about as much sense as chastising Bush for having received the support of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. Just because person X supports candidate Y's campaign does not mean candidate Y is equivalent to X or even necessarily very close to X politically.

Well you know, I like to say that they are....Tongue

Actually, though, I find support for a candidate from people like Sharpton, Jackson, Waters, etc. to be repellant.

You really can't argue that Nancy Pelosi is a big part of the party's public face.  She even appears in DNC commercials.

True, I was thinking more of Jackson/Shartpton/Waters. The first two have never even held elected office, and the third only wins in an overwhelmingly Democratic and majority-black district.

Pelosi doesn't seem to be a radical. The fact that she's from San Francisco probably makes people assume she is, but I don't see how she's any worse than someone like Newt Gingrich was for the GOP.

She's liberal, no doubt, and I'd prefer someone like Hoyer or Emmanuel as Speaker.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #436 on: August 09, 2006, 10:14:45 PM »

But remember that O'Reilly is an independent.

Sure he is. And Fox News is fair and balanced.....

In fairness, O'Reilly has been critical of the President, but he almost always couches in terms that suggest the Democrats are even worse. I can't ever recall him praising a Democrat, and he seems to have an inflated opinion of his own importance (as does pretty much everyone in the media). I remember when he suggested Al Gore would've won the election in 2000 if he'd appeared on the Factor.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #437 on: August 09, 2006, 10:15:10 PM »

But remember that O'Reilly is an independent.

Sure he is. And Fox News is fair and balanced.....

So is the New York Times.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #438 on: August 09, 2006, 10:15:31 PM »

But remember that O'Reilly is an independent.

Sure he is. And Fox News is fair and balanced.....

In fairness, O'Reilly has been critical of the President, but he almost always couches in terms that suggest the Democrats are even worse.

.....they are....Tongue
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #439 on: August 09, 2006, 10:30:21 PM »

Did you see O'Reilly trying to peg Lamont as anti-semitic because on two blogs that supported Lamont there were unknown posters who posted comments about Jews.  Then he said the media was biased for not covering it.  Of course no one covered it!  That carries as much weight as if they'd reported opebo's comments!
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #440 on: August 09, 2006, 10:31:39 PM »

Did you see O'Reilly trying to peg Lamont as anti-semitic because on two blogs that supported Lamont there were unknown posters who posted comments about Jews.  Then he said the media was biased for not covering it.  Of course no one covered it!  That carries as much weight as if they'd reported opebo's comments!

I know. I love this.

Right-wingers want to hold Democrats accountable for random comments made on some blog. It's pretty unbelievable, but typical of the scumbags they are.

Imagine if Fox News was held accountable for all the crazy sh*t that comes out of Hannity, Gibson, and O'Reilly's mouths (among others)?
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #441 on: August 09, 2006, 10:32:25 PM »

Did you see O'Reilly trying to peg Lamont as anti-semitic because on two blogs that supported Lamont there were unknown posters who posted comments about Jews.  Then he said the media was biased for not covering it.  Of course no one covered it!  That carries as much weight as if they'd reported opebo's comments!

Well if Dave Leip ever runs for higher office, he can count on having opebo's comments held against him. Smiley
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #442 on: August 09, 2006, 10:35:32 PM »

Pat Robertson, Rich Santorum, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Sam Brownback, Vernon Robinson, Ann Coulter...

The new faces of the Republican party!!

I see how Republicans invite O'Reilly, Savage, Coulter, Hannity, and Robertson up on stage with them for their victory speech...oh wait, they don't.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #443 on: August 10, 2006, 04:01:23 AM »

im sure michael moore and cindy sheehan were thrilled also!

I assume Sheehan was upset about McKinney.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 11 queries.