An alternative to the 17th Amendment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 12:05:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  An alternative to the 17th Amendment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: An alternative to the 17th Amendment  (Read 2050 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« on: January 12, 2006, 05:07:33 PM »

This seems to be an interesting idea. However, I think that this method could be very complicated and very expensive. If the people reject the state legislature's nominee, then the state would have to hold multiple elections, which would cost a lot of money and take up a lot of time. Furthermore, I feel that this method gives the Governor too much power, especially if there is a deadlock between the legislature and the people, or a deadlock between the two houses of the legislature.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2006, 06:02:34 PM »

... at least the state will still be sending a representative from the state government.
I see your point, but I would argue that someone elected by the people  represents a state just as much as someone elected by the government.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.