SENATE BILL: Party Hard Amendment (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 08:03:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Party Hard Amendment (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Party Hard Amendment (Failed)  (Read 3837 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: November 08, 2013, 01:59:41 AM »

This is a pretty straight-forward reform. The idea that three people constitute an organized political party is ludicrous.

Glad that the Labor Party has come around on this. I fully support this amendment.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2013, 12:08:31 PM »

Objection
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2013, 02:20:09 PM »

Why should the Registrar General be required to recognize parties in the first place?

Tradition
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2013, 02:25:25 PM »

Why is it our tradition? What purpose does it serve?

Its a tradition because the whole point of this thing is to organize into groups and win elections. This is a formalization of the registration process similar to how the US operates.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2013, 02:42:55 PM »

I disagree with the premise that the point of Atlasia is "to organize into groups and win elections."


You can't really disagree with that premise, the history shows us that traditionally thats what Atlasia is and was founded to be. You can see things that way now, but that isn't tradition
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2013, 02:48:34 PM »

So what? The game changes. We don't need to preserve a practice if it no longer serves any purpose. Which is why I'm asking: What purpose does recognizing parties serve?

For the purposes of balloting and other necessities: is the RG supposed to rely on a shoddy network of self-organized labels when determining what party to list someone on the ballot as?

And I've in the past proposed requiring candidates that weren't in organized parties to have to petition for ballot access. It didn't pass but it doesn't mean it should be constitutionally prohibited for the future.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2013, 03:17:43 PM »

"Which, as of now, is what this amendment addresses"

Ok, pal. You asked and I answered. Perhaps you should be more refined next time.

I'm done here, this is just contrarian nonsense
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2013, 08:24:49 PM »

No no no nononononononoononononoonon

NAY
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2013, 03:02:59 PM »

Aye
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2013, 04:01:45 PM »

So why are we voting on this amendment? Seems like its just delay for the sake of delay from an undistinguished senator...
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2013, 04:16:33 PM »
« Edited: November 12, 2013, 04:18:16 PM by Nappy Hair »

So why are we voting on this amendment? Seems like its just delay for the sake of delay from an undistinguished senator...

Well, I doubt Spiral could distinguish himself more than missing FORTY PERCENT OF THE VOTES in the last session like you did.

Obviously I'm not talking about Spiral.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2013, 04:20:19 PM »

My nonvoting was a form of expression.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2013, 04:24:26 PM »

I just introduced a bill clarifying our laws for human clones.

What have you done lately?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2013, 04:26:40 PM »

I find it quite odd that TNF is going after Napoleon so hard on inactivity, considering he has expressed multiple times that he will give his first preference in December to Xahar, the least active Senator by far.

Dick buddies?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2013, 01:08:58 AM »

Abstain
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.