Why was New Hampshire so close? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 06:25:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why was New Hampshire so close? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Huh
#1
NH was a good fit for both candidates.
#2
NH was a good fit for Clinton.
#3
NH was a good fit for Trump.
#4
NH was a bad fit for either candidate.
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: Why was New Hampshire so close?  (Read 3361 times)
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,700
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17
« on: October 27, 2019, 12:23:31 PM »
Quote from: darklordoftech on October 19, 2019, 02:02:47 PM
In the 90s, New Hampshire was a “rust belt” state and a bastion of paleoconservatism. It was only in the 9/11 era that it became a blue state.

How was it a bastion of paleoconservatism? Sure, it elected Bob Smith and Pat Buchanan did well there but was it really strong for that strain of thought beyond them?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.