taxes question
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 11:14:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  taxes question
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is more important to you?
#1
The amount you pay in taxes
 
#2
That the public revinue is spent responsibly
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: taxes question  (Read 2063 times)
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 16, 2007, 09:55:29 PM »

Choose.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2007, 10:34:53 PM »

How responsible spending is will ultimately decide how much we pay in taxes.
Logged
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2007, 11:48:10 PM »

How responsible spending is will ultimately decide how much we pay in taxes.

In a way. So perhaps I should clairfy.

Would you rather:

A - pay lower taxes but have most of the revenues spent on projects you consider wasteful, with little going to useful projects.

B - pay higher taxes but have most of the revenues spent on projects you consider useful and are well managed with proper oversight?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2007, 12:03:18 AM »

Option 2 - but we need to limit spending.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2007, 12:01:37 PM »

How responsible spending is will ultimately decide how much we pay in taxes.

In a way. So perhaps I should clairfy.

Would you rather:

A - pay lower taxes but have most of the revenues spent on projects you consider wasteful, with little going to useful projects.

B - pay higher taxes but have most of the revenues spent on projects you consider useful and are well managed with proper oversight?

Its hard to pick either A or B but I guess I'd pick A on the assumption that if we reduced the tax rate to 0% then it would eliminate all waste and fraud.

But the situation we actually have today is high taxes and waste, for example;
A war that we didn't need to be in.
Bridge to nowhere.
Social benefits for illegal immigrants.
$18 billion in pork projects.
Medicare/medicaid fraud - being billed for wheelchairs that the allegded recipient never ordered or received, among other things.

Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2007, 12:23:10 PM »

We pay pretty high taxes here.  Most people here don't bitch about that, except a select group of conservatives, who will always bitch about taxes and always have.

The debate here tends to be whether or not the money is well spent.  Generally, it is.  We have a very efficient state government.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2007, 02:02:19 PM »

A-I realize that my priorities are not everyone's priorities.   The vast majority may not consider it wasteful.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2007, 10:32:31 PM »

B kind of goes hand in hand with A, at least for me.  If the government was only spending money on the programs I feel they should be, we wouldn't have high taxes anyway.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2007, 10:39:03 PM »

If we lower tax rates, then that lowers the amount of potential for wasteful spending.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2007, 11:12:49 PM »

If we lower tax rates, then that lowers the amount of potential for wasteful spending.

Not the way they like to simply deficit spend.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2007, 11:15:24 PM »

If we lower tax rates, then that lowers the amount of potential for wasteful spending.

Not the way they like to simply deficit spend.

I'm against deficit spending unless they have beforehand a sound way of paying it back.  Of course I thought the nature of this question to be more of what the ideal would be.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2007, 11:17:04 PM »

B kind of goes hand in hand with A, at least for me.  If the government was only spending money on the programs I feel they should be, we wouldn't have high taxes anyway.

Amen.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2007, 11:27:15 PM »
« Edited: June 17, 2007, 11:32:45 PM by Verily »

If we lower tax rates, then that lowers the amount of potential for wasteful spending.

Not the way they like to simply deficit spend.

I'm against deficit spending unless they have beforehand a sound way of paying it back.  Of course I thought the nature of this question to be more of what the ideal would be.

The two situations are meant to be exclusive, I think. Thus:

A) Taxes are lower, but government efficiency remains the same. Less money is collected, but an equivalent percent of it goes towards ineffective projects.

B) Government is 100% efficient, but taxes remain the same. All of the money collected in taxes is spent effectively.

In any case, I really don't understand your logic that lowering taxes will improve government effectiveness. Politicians prefer ineffective spending to effective spending because it bolsters their reelection chances to build an eight-lane highway between Anchorage and Fairbanks (just a hypothetical example, of course). Give them less money to spend and they'll take it out of the budgets of the useful government programs, not pork. This, of course, is why the whole concept of tax cuts is misguided.

The former situation is far more realistic, but clearly the latter situation is better.
Logged
AkSaber
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2007, 05:24:29 PM »

How responsible spending is will ultimately decide how much we pay in taxes.

Agreed.

Also agreed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.236 seconds with 12 queries.