Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 01:10:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the better president?
#1
Wilson (D)
 
#2
Wilson (R)
 
#3
Wilson (I/O)
 
#4
Coolidge (D)
 
#5
Coolidge (R)
 
#6
Coolidge (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Author Topic: Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge  (Read 8893 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: July 31, 2014, 12:21:28 PM »

A pro-business fiscal conservative who was strongly in favor of anti-lunching and other civil rights legislation vs. a racist segregationist who governed as a fiscal liberal?  An absurdly easy choice.

Coolidge (R)
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 04:19:48 PM »

A pro-business fiscal conservative who was strongly in favor of anti-lunching and other civil rights legislation

Did Coolidge actually succeed in passing any anti-lynching or civil rights legislation though? As far as I know, the only race-based legislation that he signed while President was the blatantly racist Immigration Act of 1924.

He publicly called for it, but as usual, all efforts would be killed by Democrats in Congress.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 05:00:55 PM »
« Edited: July 31, 2014, 05:03:05 PM by Rockefeller GOP »

MOP, yes I think there's absolutely a difference.  Just because the other party obstructed Coolidge's pro-civil rights goals does not equate him to an open segregationist...  Also, thought I'd drop these here:

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/calvin-coolidge-civil-rights-pioneer-91065_Page2.html

http://blog.independent.org/2009/12/13/not-so-silent-coolidge-and-civil-rights/
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2014, 09:38:28 PM »


As a Republican, please tell me what there is to like.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2014, 09:40:11 PM »

MOP, yes I think there's absolutely a difference.  Just because the other party obstructed Coolidge's pro-civil rights goals does not equate him to an open segregationist...

No, Coolidge was not on the same level as an open segregationist. I guess that my point is that if someone has more in common with Wilson's approach to government than with Coolidge's, but is troubled by Wilson's racism (as any modern observer should be), it isn't necessarily worth it to vote for Coolidge on account of that one issue, given that, whatever his personal feelings, the latter did no more to improve the rights of African-Americans in real terms than Wilson did.

Fair enough.  I guess I was thinking along the lines that in a campaign between the two in some hypothetical realm, I'd find Coolidge's rhetoric on the issue appealing.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2014, 02:51:14 PM »

This is pretty easy. Sure, Wilson had plenty of flaws, but he's responsible for a lot of progressive legislation, while Coolidge caused the Great Depression.

Yeah, all by himself!  And FDR fixed it all by himself, huh?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.