Were there any red flags that indicated the race would be closer than polling suggested? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2024, 09:42:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Were there any red flags that indicated the race would be closer than polling suggested? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were there any red flags that indicated the race would be closer than polling suggested?  (Read 2116 times)
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,342
United States


P P
WWW
« on: March 07, 2021, 11:39:53 PM »

Aside from pre-COVID personal anecdotes from friends, coworkers, and Reddit- for me it was

1) WA state referendum 88's narrow defeat in 2019, even though Yes got the lion's share of endorsements. Not related to the GE but it got me thinking about non-response bias
2) Biden's surprise comeback on Super Tuesday as the least "progressive" and the most "populist" candidate
3) Trump doing absurdly well in Univision's post-debate polls
4) this 2020 graphic of Asian American voter identification patterns from 2012 to 2020 (source).


There were also these Feb 2020 Atlas threads:
Logged
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,342
United States


P P
WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2021, 08:25:51 PM »

2) Biden's surprise comeback on Super Tuesday as the least "progressive" and the most "populist" candidate
Most POPULIST???
what about BERNIE




Re: "Why is Sanders underperforming?" (Feb 2020)

Because he's simultaneously become more tied to the post-Obama/Trump-era Democratic Party and pulled a lot of cargo cult bourgeois socialists into or around his campaign. Meanwhile, other candidates have adopted some of his policy proposals and made a joke out of them.

Also, the fact that he's approaching 80 (he literally had a heart attack!) is not going to go away as a concern.

Different and arguably less appealing coalition than in 2016 (see also PR's post) + less support from Independents + no longer really perceived as a "fresh face", certainly less so than in 2016 + underwhelming base turnout + still perceived as an "agent of change" but less so than four years ago + less support from anti-establishment and rural voters + running against stronger opponents than Clinton ("not Hillary" isn’t really an option this time), etc.

My theory is that voters on the left wing of the party are already supporting Sanders (or maybe Warren), meaning that most of the late deciders are more centrist, conservative, or non-ideological, and a lot of these voters are turned off by Sanders's ideology. Exit polls showed that about half of New Hampshire Democratic primary voters thought that Sanders is too far left.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.