WARNING to the Republican Party: Don't go back to Reform or NeoConservatism! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 06:49:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  WARNING to the Republican Party: Don't go back to Reform or NeoConservatism! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WARNING to the Republican Party: Don't go back to Reform or NeoConservatism!  (Read 1571 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« on: November 06, 2020, 05:39:44 PM »

At the very least, I want to see them stop with anti-science.

Agreed. Climate change is a very real and pressing threat. You don't have to support AOC's Green New Deal, but you can come with alternative solutions.

LOL! This year is proof that Climate Change is not a very real and pressing threat. there is a drop in human caused emissions by approximately 10% annualized and no impact on the rise of atmosphere CO2 levels.

While we need to wait for studies to analyze this, from what I'm seeing, I would say that human emissions are not the dominant driver of the rise of CO2 levels.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2020, 06:13:48 PM »

At the very least, I want to see them stop with anti-science.

Agreed. Climate change is a very real and pressing threat. You don't have to support AOC's Green New Deal, but you can come with alternative solutions.

LOL! This year is proof that Climate Change is not a very real and pressing threat. there is a drop in human caused emissions by approximately 10% annualized and no impact on the rise of atmosphere CO2 levels.

While we need to wait for studies to analyze this, from what I'm seeing, I would say that human emissions are not the dominant driver of the rise of CO2 levels.


Clearly you have no basic grasp of science if you think that any result would be instant, or that the total stored CO2 in the atmosphere would drop (which is what's necessary to reverse climate change)

I have a full grasp of science having read everything about Climate Change in 2008, unlike you. I do not expect that the CO2 levels would drop. I expected that there would be a correlation with human emissions that dropped, so I would expect that CO2 levels would grow less than previous years. That's not happening.

I will be waiting for scientific studies that will analyze the data and possibly find an explanation.

There has never been a clear link between the amount of emitted CO2 and the increase of CO2 content in the atmosphere and the discrepancy was explained by a theory that excess CO2 emitted by humans is dissolved in the oceans. Nevertheless, reduced emissions should cause reduced growth of CO2 levels if there is a correlation between the two.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.