Grades of British Prime Ministers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 07:43:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Grades of British Prime Ministers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Grades of British Prime Ministers  (Read 4943 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: August 16, 2009, 09:09:08 AM »

Thatcher : F
Major : E
Blair : C
Brown : E

Don't know enough for the previous ( except A for Churchill during WWII ).
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2009, 07:07:24 AM »

I need to know why Churchill is getting bad grades.

I suppose bad grades refer to his second term.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2009, 07:42:06 AM »

I need to know why Churchill is getting bad grades.

I suppose bad grades refer to his second term.

Yes. He was too old. He was a good war leader, but even during the war he was not great on the domestic front.

Exactly. He fully deserved his 1945 defeat, since he behaved as a primarily anti-welfare paleoconservative.
Formidable leader on the right moment, but a poor one in normal times.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2009, 06:35:36 PM »
« Edited: August 18, 2009, 06:38:12 PM by Antonio V »

I didn't noticed Disraeli was a troll until now... But there's a time for anything.

I need to know why Churchill is getting bad grades.

I suppose bad grades refer to his second term.

Yes. He was too old. He was a good war leader, but even during the war he was not great on the domestic front.

Exactly. He fully deserved his 1945 defeat, since he behaved as a primarily anti-welfare paleoconservative.
Formidable leader on the right moment, but a poor one in normal times.

Being anti-welfare is good.

Being primarily and caricaturally anti-welfare for stupid reasons is certainly not.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.