Red state turning blue (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 02:16:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Red state turning blue (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which red state is the most likely to turn blue?
#1
Alabama
#2
Alaska
#3
Idaho
#4
Kansas
#5
Mississippi
#6
Nebraska
#7
North Dakota
#8
Oklahoma
#9
South Carolina
#10
South Dakota
#11
Texas
#12
Utah
#13
Wyoming
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Red state turning blue  (Read 13722 times)
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,276
United Kingdom


« on: September 20, 2011, 01:53:40 PM »


36.66% in 2000, 37.00% in 2010. Hispanics are growing too (like everywhere else), but this is all probably neutralized by the fact that Mississippi whites are becoming even more Republican with yellow dog types dying out, like Gene Taylor found out. It's highly unlikely this state will change much politically on presidential level in foreseeable future.

Popular, moderate Democratic incumbent (like Clinton in 1996) could win Dakotas if he decided to target them intentionally as "crown jewels" in a successful reelection bid, but that's unlikely because Dakotas are not worth much electorally.


You can't get much more republican than 90-10.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,276
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2011, 03:01:00 PM »


36.66% in 2000, 37.00% in 2010. Hispanics are growing too (like everywhere else), but this is all probably neutralized by the fact that Mississippi whites are becoming even more Republican with yellow dog types dying out, like Gene Taylor found out. It's highly unlikely this state will change much politically on presidential level in foreseeable future.

Popular, moderate Democratic incumbent (like Clinton in 1996) could win Dakotas if he decided to target them intentionally as "crown jewels" in a successful reelection bid, but that's unlikely because Dakotas are not worth much electorally.


You can't get much more republican than 90-10.
I thought it was more like 85-15. But Republicans definitely don't need much since minority growth is rather slow in Mississippi.
I agree that there is no danger of mississippi swinging anytime soon but that won't be because of whites trending republican but as you say slow minority growth.

Here's the exit poll: http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/exitpolls/mississippi.html
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.