Would it be a mistake for the GOP nominee not to vet Martinez, Sandoval, Rubio? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 10:32:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would it be a mistake for the GOP nominee not to vet Martinez, Sandoval, Rubio? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would it be a huge mistake if the GOP nominee does not vet Martinez, Sandoval and Rubio for VP?
#1
Yes, the GOP needs a game-changer in 2016 and they cannot pick a Thune or a Portman, it's too safe, uninspiring, low-risk, low-reward
 
#2
No, Sandoval, Rubio, and Martinez are not fully experienced and vetted nationally
 
#3
It does not matter
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Would it be a mistake for the GOP nominee not to vet Martinez, Sandoval, Rubio?  (Read 828 times)
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« on: April 10, 2014, 05:03:33 PM »

Martinez won't run for President, but I suspect she'd be open to VP for the right candidate. She'd probably say yes to Walker if he asked her.

Sandoval won't be considered.

Rubio would accept a VP spot if he thought they would have a chance at winning, but not if they're a long shot. He wouldn't want to lose his senate seat for a long shot at VP.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.