Knowing that so many people vote in advance these days, they should just assign advanced votes to polling stations/precincts. Isn't this how it's done in some US states? I think NB does this too.
Doing so complicates and delays the counting of advance votes for no real benefit other than psephological curiosity.
Then may I ask you something: why don't *you* have that psephological curiosity? Why do you look upon electoral geography in such drab, utilitarian terms?
You know, if there's a term for the highest-operating version of such curiosity, it might be: "electoral psychogeography". Related to this concept
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PsychogeographyAnd it's a positive reflex, in that it breeds an free-form electoral "engagement to place", akin to other psychogeographical applications--but it's also not *too* far removed from how actual election campaigns work; and moreover, it can fuel the game plan for candidates and campaign teams, and in a way that's "meaningful" even in losing causes. Because the finer the polling-station detail, the more one can superengage to super-local conditions, even within so-called/supposed "alien territory"--it gives it all dimension, it gives it all structure, more so than big amorphous megapoll blobs.
So maybe when I bring up the left, it's because in Canada, at least, the left's been ahead when it comes to an inherently "psychogeography-adjacent" approach to electioneering--an iconic case in point being the provincial byelection in Riverdale in 1964, where the NDP mastered door-to-door canvassing techniques that have subsequently become universal. But then again, the notion of psychogeography has *always* been left-adjacent, whether "revolutionary" (the Situationist International) or "bourgeois" (the Jane Jacobs-inspired Jane's Walks).
Nevertheless, the nature of "electoral psychogeography" is such that, in essence, it transcends partisanship--it's more of an "electoral bystander" reflex, actually. And as such, it's the purest form of "electoral sense of place", and in a way that can make someplace superficially electorally boring as dirt (those monolithically rural UCP, or for that matter urban NDP, ridings) show "added dimension". It brings you right there; breeds curiosity about a place, even if it's about a spot polling station that's only 75% Conservative vs 85% riding-wide, and how the non-Conservative candidates line up (which works best when it's not a baldly binary race--that is, the *dullest* Alberta races were those where there were only two candidates: UCP and NDP). Do that in combination with Google Earth, and it's practically an alibi for a carbon-neutral form of road-trip-and-beyond "travel", urban study, etc.
And I know that you, yourself, might have bigger fish to fry than to dig into the Canadian poll-by-polls--but if you're one to discount the value of that kind of electoral-and-beyond curiosity *entirely*, then you truly are an uninspired individual...