He's the President's son. His own laptop shows e-mails that suggest he peddles influence with his father and that his father is a business partner of his.
Ah yes, the mysterious laptop of which nobody can prove where it came from, or even who dropped it off at the repair shop in the first place. Very compelling evidence!
By the way, it’s Boebert. If you’re going to shill for this moron, at least spell her name correctly.
I'll point out THIS very post the nest time a wave of Red Avatars complain about "whataboutism" and "derailing threads".
You're the expert, given that a thread about Lauren Boebert is now about Hunter Biden.
And just why is that? Is it because of the double standard so many have hear regarding honest reporting of allegations of wrongdoing? That only allegations (supported by evidence, as the allegations of Hunter Biden's wrongdoing are) against conservatives should be vigorously reported, investigated, and discussed?
Note how one counterexample where alleged wrongdoing is shielded where an allegation against Boebert is actually MAGNIFIED as if they're fitting her for an orange jumpsuit as we speak, while allegations against the President's son that are still under Federal Investigation that involve acts that can be described as influence peddling are not even discussed by the Red Avatars here, and by the media, who traded their honesty and curiosity for favor with the King and his Court. Do Red Avatars have guilty consciences about their own double standards in matters such as this? If so, that's a sign of real progress. Perhaps the guilty consciences can someday morph into an atmosphere where, at a minimum, the same standards of conduct can be applied to all, regardless of race, color, creed, or politics.
Why don’t we make this thread about allegations about anyone who isn’t the subject of this thread?
