Keystone XL Pipeline Project thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:35:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Keystone XL Pipeline Project thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will President Obama ultimately decide to approve the construction of the pipeline?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: Keystone XL Pipeline Project thread  (Read 8558 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« on: December 15, 2013, 12:53:36 AM »

The left getting infected by knee-jerk bourgeois environmentalism is unfortunate. This pipeline is significantly safer than the alternative (delivering the oil by rail) anyway.

And having it sent via pipeline to be refined in the U.S. is much safer (and would contribute less GHGs) than the alternative--ship it via oil tanker to China.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2014, 05:34:43 PM »

A push by environmental groups against the project may be affecting public opinion: 58 percent of poll respondents say they want Canada to take steps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions as a condition for approval, with 32 percent opposing such a requirement.

Canada is a tiny country population wise.  What do their miniscule Green House emissions have to do with anything?

Although per capita their emission rates are pretty high.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2014, 05:51:30 PM »

If they build it, then the U.S. should get some of the oil from it instead of letting it get shipped overseas. Fair is fair.

That's up to the companies who own the oil...
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2014, 11:31:04 PM »

If they build it, then the U.S. should get some of the oil from it instead of letting it get shipped overseas. Fair is fair.

For free?

For free.

So what should American companies give other companies when they travel over their airspace?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2014, 11:01:17 PM »

So what do you all think?  Is the State Department EIS on the pipeline so compromised by the oil industry that it is too biased to be reliable, as the Greens are claiming here

It absolutely is.

Evidence?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2014, 01:03:32 AM »


Does the Public Service Commission oppose the current pipeline plan?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.