Alabama Megathread 3: Results Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 09, 2024, 05:27:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Alabama Megathread 3: Results Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who will win?
#1
Roy Moore (R)
 
#2
Doug Jones (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 189

Author Topic: Alabama Megathread 3: Results Thread  (Read 128895 times)
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« on: December 12, 2017, 01:55:31 PM »

Very excited to see how this turns out tonight. I have ordered pizza and a cookie brownie to arrive 1 hour after poll close which is when  I hope the results will start getting exciting.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2017, 01:58:06 PM »

central
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2017, 09:22:59 PM »

Guys look at the time series for the predicted margin/win percentage on the NYT page. Wild swings all night. Don't get hopes too high because at one point in time it has Jones at > 2

Sure but it can swing wildly while still being accurate at any given point.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2017, 09:35:24 PM »

NYTimes had it at 90% Jones at +8.3 for a second

Now back to +4.6

Moore in the lead by about 4% with 50% in

I think it's fair to say that if Jones fails to come back Nate Cohn will have lost most of his credibility tonight

No? 90% != 100%
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2017, 10:14:08 PM »

I'm predicting a 0.5% Jones victory. Subject to change. On the NYT page and watching CNN's hopeful analysis.

Edit: For f***'s sake I've submitted like 5 times and it always shows up the "Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post."

You can turn off that warning in your personal settings. I did that a long time ago.


Damn. Been here for three years and just found that out.

13 for me. Wink
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2017, 10:22:25 PM »

NY Times has Jones >95% chance to win.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2017, 10:33:46 PM »

Wish MSNBC would call it so they can stop pretending like it's technically uncertain.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2017, 10:36:08 PM »

Also means Jones can vote his conscious instead of trying to cater to a conservative state.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2017, 11:00:22 PM »

Now the important thing for Jones - keep the margin  high enough to prevent a recount or other shenanigans. Good chance of hitting a margin high enough, but still too close for comfort.

Even if a recount is triggered, I think it's incredibly unlikely that it could overturn this margin.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2017, 11:04:09 PM »

Now the important thing for Jones - keep the margin  high enough to prevent a recount or other shenanigans. Good chance of hitting a margin high enough, but still too close for comfort.

Even if a recount is triggered, I think it's incredibly unlikely that it could overturn this margin.

You sure they won't simply "lose" votes or "find" new ones?

That happens in every recount. My knowledge of that was factored into my conclusion.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2017, 11:47:22 PM »

As happy as I am I can't shake the fact that half of the state voted for a man who had considerable evidence showing that he was predatory against underage women all because he had an R next to his name.

Yeah, this is just a minimum threshold good thing but still a positive result.

I thought write in had to have won or be within recount territory of winning to get counted. You're not supposed to write in someone that's on the ballot.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,476
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2017, 12:02:53 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Provisionals + military ballots. We'll see how they turn out.

Count every ballot, amiright. Wink

Count 'em yeah. Just not very likely they're gonna get it to the threshold.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.