PPP: Huckabee 1st in 2012 North Carolina GOP primary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 03:13:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  PPP: Huckabee 1st in 2012 North Carolina GOP primary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP: Huckabee 1st in 2012 North Carolina GOP primary  (Read 956 times)
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« on: February 19, 2010, 05:03:16 PM »

Romney should not be this close in North Carolina.  I think Huckabee and Palin are just going to take votes away from each other.  Bring Thune into the equation and the moderate (Non-religious, Economically conservative) Republicans will be able to rally around another canidate.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2010, 09:35:08 PM »

Huh?  Palin and Huckabee are already taking votes from each other and he's in third place.

The only way he benefits from Palin and Huckabee taking votes from each other is if he's leading, not trailing both of them.

In the event that one of them doesn't run, he'd lose this state quite easily when McCain was able to keep defeats to Huckabee in Deep South states by under 5 points and North Carolina isn't a deep south state.

It's pretty clear that either palin or huckabee would win NC by double digits against Romney.

I am assuming that Huckabee and Palin are both vying for Christian Conservatives and far-right in the Deep South, and I will use Tennessee and South Carolina to display why I think you should be worried that Romney is basically within striking distance of Palin and Huckabee.  Huckabee never competed in Virginia and North Carolina, so I can’t use those states as examples of what I’m talking about.  His campaign was basically over after February 4.  

Huckabee received 30% of the vote in the South Carolina primary. He lost because Fred Thompson took away lots of vote from him. The Far-right Christian Republican vote was split between the two and this allowed McCain to beat Huckabee by a mere 15,000 votes.  McCain’s victory in New Hampshire also helped him bring together the moderate Republicans in South Carolina.  In addition, there were many voters who were split between Mitt Romney and Huckabee in South Carolina.  Many experts on CNN and Fox commented on this.  

Huckabee won in Tennessee with 34% of the vote, but it was only a slight victory against McCain.  Again, many experts commented that Huckabee and Romney had lost a few states that night because they were taking votes away from each other.  Voters saw them as more religious and far-right than McCain.  Romney received 23% of the vote.

McCain was a moderate who would have had a difficult time beating Huckabee, Thompson and Romney if they hadn’t split the vote.  Huckabee, Thompson and Romney accounted for over 60% in South Carolina and 60% in Tennessee.  Had the Christian and far-right vote been able to decide on a candidate after New Hampshire, McCain probably wouldn’t have won South Carolina, which basically launched his campaign to victory.  

Palin and Huckabee might split up the vote in states like Iowa and South Carolina.  They won’t win in New Hampshire or Nevada.  This puts them at risk of losing to Romney in all four states.  Add Thune to the equation and this North Carolina poll might have looked closer.  It’s just something to think about.  I know you like both Huckabee and Palin, but I think they’re at risk if both of them run.  JMHO
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2010, 11:01:27 PM »

Greatone,

But you are neglecting the fact that Romney is losing to both of them with the vote split.  So even if you assume that they are taking votes from each other, it doesn't matter as Romney is still losing.

The only way for Romney to benefit from Palin and Huckabee hypothetically taking votes from each other is if he leading, not trailing both of them.

And in the more likely hypothetical where only one of them is running, Romney would be losing by 10-15 points because both have a pretty good percentage with the vote already being split.

In order for your theory to work, we'd need to see something like Romney 31 Huckabee 28 Palin 24.  However, we see Huckabee 33 Palin 27 Romney 25, meaning that Romney still would lose with a split vote.
I stated that Romney is within striking distance.  He’s only down by 8 in a state that greatly favors Huckabee and Palin.  If the vote wasn’t split between Palin and Huckabee, one of them would have 40-50%.  Just like Romney could win Nevada by 40+.  The demographics in that state favor him.  I am merely theorizing that it is possible for Romney to win the first 4 states with Palin and Huckabee vying for the same voters.  I believe North Carolina is similar to South Carolina in demographics and geography.  You basically get what I’m saying in your third paragraph where you say, “where only one of them is running, Romney would be losing by 10-15 points.”  Almost my exact beliefs.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2010, 11:05:36 PM »

Has there been a Nevada poll?  If not, why shade it red for Romney?
Nevada???  Nevadas not shaded, utah and newhampshire are shaded for romney
I think he's saying that there has been a poll in Nevada, but I don't really know which one he's talking about.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.