Douglas and Lincoln: slavery? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 09:29:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Douglas and Lincoln: slavery? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Douglas and Lincoln: slavery?  (Read 6422 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: March 25, 2007, 06:25:36 AM »

If I recall correctly, Lincoln was in favor of abolition, while Douglas was in favor of leaving it up to the states.
Lincoln was not (publicly) in favor of abolition. He was in favor of banning it in DC and the territories, though. Douglas was in favor of allowing the residents of a territory to ban it, which amounted, in practice, to the same thing. As everybody knew.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2007, 06:56:02 AM »

If I recall correctly, Lincoln was in favor of abolition, while Douglas was in favor of leaving it up to the states.
Lincoln was not (publicly) in favor of abolition. He was in favor of banning it in DC and the territories, though. Douglas was in favor of allowing the residents of a territory to ban it, which amounted, in practice, to the same thing. As everybody knew.

More important was that Lincoln's Republican supporters were adamantly anti-slavery while the Northern Democrats (though not necessarily Douglas specifically) were only half-heartedly anti-slavery.

Actually the abolition movement was a very small margin compared to all the moderate Republicans and Democrats up north. Its' been estimated that no more then 10% of the Republican party was actually and truly abolishionists and even those that supported abolishion many supported 'deporting' slaves back to Africa in the experiment called Liberia.

ROFL. The Republican Party was based on an anti-slavery platform; that was it's most distinguishing characteristic. Are you trying to tell me that the 10% the Free Soil Party got in 1848 were the only people opposed to slavery in the entire country?

10% as radical abolitionists willing to actively and illegally free slaves in the South as vigilantes, maybe, but 10% in favor of abolition? Ha!
Free Soil's ten percent include people who simply loved Old Kinderhook.
And even Free Soil was (at least technically) only against any further expansion of slavery, not abolutionist.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2007, 06:58:26 AM »


Hey I'm special Ed sometimes I don't understand things.  I have a learning disability.  sorry.

Ah, may I recommend a new avatar then :



That's Nym's avatar... DWDL's avatar would be more fitting, wouldn't it? Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2007, 08:28:24 AM »


Hey I'm special Ed sometimes I don't understand things.  I have a learning disability.  sorry.

Ah, may I recommend a new avatar then :



ARe u saying that only the Dems care about ppl with learning disabilities?
No, he's saying that Dems ARE ppl with learning disabilities.

He was joking.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.