or Acting President Pelosi
AAAAAAGH!
That's the scariest thing I've ever heard. No system of government should ever lead to the possibility of "Acting President Pelosi," no matter how remote that possibility is
If the House cannot decide by January 20 he will become Acting President until the House DOES decide. The House can take until the next presidential election to choose. That is the way it works.
So, if there aren't 26 state delegations controlled by one party, it's pretty much a guarantee that the Acting President will be Acting until at least January 2007.
Damn, that could get messed up.
11/2/04: 269-269 tie, Democrats re-take CT House delegation, retake majority in Senate
1/6/05: House deadlocked on Presidential vote, Senate elects Edwards VP
1/20/05: Edwards becomes Acting President, appoints Acting VP, Cabinet.
11/7/06: North Dakota elects Republican congressman, giving the Republicans their 26 states back.
1/3/07: House elects George W Bush President!!!!
1/4/07: George Bush sworn in, fires Edwards Cabinet, re-appoints Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, etc...
Now, this brings up an interesting question: would Bush be elegible for a 3rd term? Would the House actually
delay their election of Bush (until after 1/20/07) to allow him to be elegible for a 3rd term?