Is Dom, Is Good: NSW State Election (March 25) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 01:07:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Is Dom, Is Good: NSW State Election (March 25) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is Dom, Is Good: NSW State Election (March 25)  (Read 6823 times)
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,761


« on: January 13, 2023, 05:35:50 AM »

If NSW flips, would that mean Labour is statistically back to its 2007 grip over state legislatures?
Logged
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,761


« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2023, 05:05:36 AM »
« Edited: March 28, 2023, 05:24:42 AM by Epaminondas »

Isn't Ryde still on track to be won by Labour? That would bring them to 46.

Is the shocking turnaround turnaround due to voting pattern among certain demographics? (e.g. old people voting early for the Coalition)

Almost all the nail-biters seem to have been won by the losing party, just like in the 2022 federal election. Dreadful luck.
Logged
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,761


« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2023, 05:40:58 AM »

Onto the NSW Liberal leadership election!

Hang on, why are the counts for the last constituencies still stuck at 76% on media outlets? Esp. Ryde and Terrigal.
Logged
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,761


« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2023, 01:55:29 PM »

(If you allocate crossbench seats on 2pp it looks pretty normal. 2019 had 52/48 come to 53/40 in seats. This time ~53/47 will come to ~51/42 in seats.)

Yes, this is the very definition of hard done.
Logged
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,761


« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2023, 02:48:10 AM »
« Edited: April 02, 2023, 02:51:54 AM by Epaminondas »

Hard done by is Federal 1998 or the average SA election. Labor’s just where you’d expect a narrow government defeat to be with an anemic primary vote.

Simple:
- When the PV loser wins an election, it's a travesty. Like Federal 1998, 1990, 1969, 1961, 1954, 1940.
- When the winner earns a lower share of seats than its 2PP share, they're hard done.

Trying to conflate the two just reveals a lack of belief in fair democratic representation. But given that splits have almost always favoured the Cons, I can see how you'd get to that point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.