Do you support the Dem's super delegate system the way it is? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 11:41:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Do you support the Dem's super delegate system the way it is? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: skip
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
write in
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 101

Author Topic: Do you support the Dem's super delegate system the way it is?  (Read 11553 times)
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


« on: April 12, 2016, 02:35:52 PM »
« edited: April 12, 2016, 02:37:34 PM by Chickenhawk »

Sanders hack who likes superdels reporting in.

I think letting the elected officials have a say in the ticket they're going to have to run under is fine.

We've just got a set of cowardly and myopic elected officials right now.
Logged
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2016, 02:48:55 PM »

Sanders hack who likes superdels reporting in.

I think letting the elected officials have a say in the ticket they're going to have to run under is fine.

We've just got a set of cowardly and myopic elected officials right now.
Chicken, even? Tongue

As others have said, it's irrelevant this cycle because Clinton will get the necessary number of pledged delegates. That said, superdelegates are good for the health of the parties. Without them, candidates like George McGovern (and/or Bernie Sanders) and Barry Goldwater (and/or Donald Trump) get nominated.

The way in which they are allocated is probably in need of reform. As Leader Pelosi has pointed out.

Not that superdelegates have ever actually decided a primary.


Uhhh, McGovern got nominated in a system that contained Supers.

<<Insert fight here where Sanders is a better candidate than Clinton any day and you too suffer from the blindness that is destroying the Democratic party>>
Logged
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2016, 10:16:37 AM »

Sanders hack who likes superdels reporting in.

I think letting the elected officials have a say in the ticket they're going to have to run under is fine.

We've just got a set of cowardly and myopic elected officials right now.
The conservative wing of the Democratic party is more interested in winning than in fighting for principles. This problem has existed for a long time.

True. But that doesn't mean it's unfixable.
Logged
Shameless Lefty Hack
Chickenhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,178


« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2016, 07:02:23 PM »

Winning is fighting for your principles.

Clinton's a little bit to the right of me on some things (I still agree with her on 92% of issues), while Sanders' is more in line (~95%). Republicans, meanwhile are entirely disagreeable.

Let's not turn this into a Sanders Hack/Clinton Hack thread, but like...

Principles, Clinton... Gotcha.

Whitepapers aren't appointments, policy on the trail isn't policy in office, or even on the negotiating table, and I'd much prefer to use the past 20 years to judge Clinton's policy than what she says now, even if it does sound nice to the ears.   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.