Atlas vs. AP Vote Count (Bush at 60.418M or 59.841M?) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 04:13:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Atlas vs. AP Vote Count (Bush at 60.418M or 59.841M?) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Atlas vs. AP Vote Count (Bush at 60.418M or 59.841M?)  (Read 3449 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« on: November 12, 2004, 01:59:23 AM »

Didn't know there was such a difference in totals.  I'd like to know as well.  Where are all these ballots coming from anyway?  California absentees?  Late arriving military ballots?  Provisional ballots?  Where?

I'm continuing voting on my personal diebold machine in my garage. Smiley
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2004, 05:56:02 PM »

Didn't know there was such a difference in totals.  I'd like to know as well.  Where are all these ballots coming from anyway?  California absentees?  Late arriving military ballots?  Provisional ballots?  Where?

I'm continuing voting on my personal diebold machine in my garage. Smiley

Come on now; I don't believe all of that conspiracy garbage about Diebold either.

If they really are stealing the election for the Republicans, please keep me in the dark; I don't like conspiracy theories and I'd feel stupid if one was actually proven to be true. :-)

I remember reading some stuff from a guy who believed that every election since 1968 was rigged by the CIA and that if America's actual opinions were to surface in an elections the Republican Party would lose in a landslide in every single election.

He based this off of the fact that he didn't personally know anybody who voted for the Republicans since that date.

I suppose we all believe some manner of craziness...

Gotta love that anecdotal evidence.

A nonrandom poll of 20 or so voters is very accurate.....

Someone needs to take a statistics class, methinks.

I've heard the same garbage as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.