First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.
Second, probably not, except:
I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).
While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.
Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.
What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?
In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?
Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.
Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?
Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.
Okay, since you missed the above point, it Bears repeating. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, ever?
