Any chance of Mueller implicating the left?

[Hindsight was 2020]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

[Hindsight was 2020]

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

What? What does Lynch have to do with the Russians?

[Hindsight was 2020]

First, you can't implicate a political wing in wrongdoing. Despite the cries of the GOP that the investigation is a political witch hunt, the problem has to do with the crimes committed by people and organizations associated with the right, not with 'the right' itself.

Second, probably not, except:

I could see Jill Stein being implicated (though I think she’s more of a UI than a willing collaborator with the Russians).

While there is reason to believe the Russians were playing both sides as far as hybrid war goes, the publicly available evidence suggests actual collusion was limited to the 'right'.

Please don't brush it off - Hilary Clinton actually had collusion with Russia. Fake dossier. Steele. Ohr. Strzok. Comey. Fusion GPS. It goes on and on and on. So much corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

What are the chances that Mueller's bombshell will actually be implicating and indicting Hillary Clinton's campaign instead of/in addition to Trump's supposed crimes?

In an ideal world, he should be investigating both. My question is how likely is it that he's actually doing so and holding these cards close to his chest?  

First, off what the hell has Strzok, Comey, Steele, or Ohr done that is criminal? Second, Mueller’s is a special counsel that is assigned to investigate Trump and his team so anything Hillary has done wouldn’t be his responsibility. And third, how did Hillary “collude” with the Russians?

Until we see a transcript of Bill's convo with Loretta Lynch, we will never know if or how much Hillary colluded. As it stands right now, it is pretty much a Schroedinger's Cat situation.

Is there reason to believe that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, or is this just more smokescreen?

Since we don't know what transpired in the conversation and probably never will, it is impossible to say whether she did or didn't.

Okay, since you missed the above point, it Bears repeating. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lynch has anything to do with the Russians, ever?

Maybe, maybe not. Why haven't the contents of the conversation ever been released if there wasn't something shady there?

So your just making something up and throwing a ? at the end to avoid any responsibility for what you just posted?

[Hindsight was 2020]

You’re confusing your fake scandals- the allegation is that Clinton got Lynch to overrule the FBI investigation into her emails. Not related to Russia collusion.

Well out of 33,000 emails, I find it hard to believe that not one was Russia-related.

So again you are just making something up and demanding everyone else disprove it despite the fact that isn’t how evidence works