Why did Kennedy do poorly in Ohio? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 04:29:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Kennedy do poorly in Ohio? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Kennedy do poorly in Ohio?  (Read 3661 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,740
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: September 06, 2014, 03:45:13 PM »

Anti-Catholic sentiment + the state was traditionally Republican at the time

I doubt whatever anti-Catholic sentiment there was in Ohio was greater than in the nation as a whole given the long history of Catholics in the state (typically of the middle class German Republican variety).  It is true that the politics of Ohio were fairly Republican and conservative then.  If you compare the difference between the national and state margin, it's not far off from what it had been in 56.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,740
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2014, 07:55:51 PM »

This only proves that Nevada is more reliable than Ohio as a bellwether as it did vote for Kennedy, even when the rest of the West did not (one state by absentee ballots).

Also FDR lost Ohio at one point.

Nevada has been all reliable in every election sans 1976.

Yep, so long as you don't count anything before 1912.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.