Should the possession of automatic weapons be legal? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 02:29:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should the possession of automatic weapons be legal? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the possession of automatic weapons be legal?
#1
Damn yes
 
#2
Yes
 
#3
No
 
#4
Hell no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Should the possession of automatic weapons be legal?  (Read 5975 times)
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW
« on: April 16, 2007, 02:02:51 PM »

Amendment II "...The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2007, 08:32:48 PM »

Amendment II "...The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

I've never quite understood the invocation of that amendment as an attempt to show that every single type of gun in existence should be legal.  It seems to me that as long as the government is not restricting the people from keeping and bearing some sort of arms, then the text of the amendment has been fulfilled.

So you would have no problem with the government passing a law stating that only "pellet & BB guns and pistols can be legally owned"?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.