Hillary Launches Re-election Website (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 06:35:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Hillary Launches Re-election Website (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Launches Re-election Website  (Read 5235 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: July 13, 2005, 03:09:56 PM »

Is it me or does it look very Microsoft-ish?

Yes but it's nice. Why do Democrats have such nice campaign sites?  Sad
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2005, 03:17:19 PM »

I need to get one of these!





Icescrapers? Come on.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2005, 05:11:01 PM »

It reminds me of John Kerry's presidential website. Very slick.

They all seem to be doing that.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2005, 03:44:11 PM »

I saw Cox on CNN and all he talked about was how Hillary's a carpetbagger.  that won't work not if it didn't work in 2000.

I saw that about a week ago, too. At this point, I think the GOP's goal should be to keep Clinton from getting passed 55 - 60%. That would be something to celebrate. It's going to be difficult but it's what should be done.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2005, 03:48:27 PM »

I saw Cox on CNN and all he talked about was how Hillary's a carpetbagger.  that won't work not if it didn't work in 2000.

I saw that about a week ago, too. At this point, I think the GOP's goal should be to keep Clinton from getting passed 55 - 60%. That would be something to celebrate. It's going to be difficult but it's what should be done.

She got 55% in 2000.  If you hold her below 65% now, it's a victory.  55% is not happening.

I know she got 55% in 2000 but I was still hoping to keep her there. Very unlikely though. I guess we should aim for her staying at 60%.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2005, 03:49:25 PM »

As of 2006, she'll have been in NY for over 7 years.

Since she was sworn in in January 2001, how would she be a Senator for over seven years in 2006?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2005, 03:52:29 PM »

As of 2006, she'll have been in NY for over 7 years.

Since she was sworn in in January 2001, how would she be a Senator for over seven years in 2006?

Lived in NY, not been Senator.

I misread. Didn't she move to NY in early 2000? It's still not over seven years.  Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.