Which Clinton term was better?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 02:18:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which Clinton term was better?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think Clinton was better in 1993-1997 or 1997-2001?
#1
First term
 
#2
Second Term
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Which Clinton term was better?  (Read 668 times)
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,352
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 26, 2020, 06:41:06 AM »

Which of Clinton’s terms was better?
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2020, 02:43:41 PM »

Probably the first one.

Second term was overshadowed by his personal problems.

Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,970
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2020, 03:31:54 PM »

While Monica Lewinksy is used mostly as a punchline today, let's remember what truly happened.  Bill Clinton admitted to an inappropriate sexual relationship with a college-aged subordinate while he was President of the United States.  That characterization is unique to Clinton in the presidency's 230+ year history.  Even absent the Lewsinky scandal's implications for the Starr investigation or Paula Jones civil case, Clinton's actions represent a disregard for the solemnity of his office and a deep personal failing.  That such a tragedy played out on the national stage should be an embarrassment to every American.  None of y 'all can recognize today thanks to "2020 brain," but Clinton's personal foibles are a major contributing cause to the "celebrification" and debasing of the presidency that ultimately led to Donald Trump.       
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2020, 04:21:41 PM »

Obviously the second.  Just look at his approval ratings and midterm election results (1998 vs 1994).  Clinton was also far more politically astute in his second term (evidenced by high approval ratings).
Logged
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,352
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2020, 05:33:40 PM »

Obviously the second.  Just look at his approval ratings and midterm election results (1998 vs 1994).  Clinton was also far more politically astute in his second term (evidenced by high approval ratings).
Even with his scandal? He did so some work in Israel at the end though.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2020, 09:29:49 PM »

The one where he actually bothered to attempt to pass things of consequence, in good faith.

Not the one where he decided to do some dime store Reaganomics and waste time shagging someone.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2020, 09:52:26 PM »
« Edited: October 26, 2020, 10:04:09 PM by darklordoftech »

The second. An economic boom unlike anything in the history of the human race, crime rates were down, his party gained in Congress in the midterm elections and in the Bush/Gore election (a President’s party had never gained in midterms since FDR’s first term), and Gingrich was toppled. The first term had the Waco Siege, the Hillarycare debacle, the crime bill, the Republican Revolution of 1994, a government shutdown, the V-Chip, telecom deregulation, welfare reform, rhetoric about curfews and school uniforms, a failure to gain in Congress while getting re-elected and a failure to topple Gingrich.
Logged
John Dule
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,450
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.57, S: -7.50

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2020, 04:04:16 AM »

While Monica Lewinksy is used mostly as a punchline today, let's remember what truly happened.  Bill Clinton admitted to an inappropriate sexual relationship with a college-aged subordinate while he was President of the United States.  That characterization is unique to Clinton in the presidency's 230+ year history.  Even absent the Lewsinky scandal's implications for the Starr investigation or Paula Jones civil case, Clinton's actions represent a disregard for the solemnity of his office and a deep personal failing.  That such a tragedy played out on the national stage should be an embarrassment to every American.  None of y 'all can recognize today thanks to "2020 brain," but Clinton's personal foibles are a major contributing cause to the "celebrification" and debasing of the presidency that ultimately led to Donald Trump.       

And to think I once considered you a person worthy of having serious conversations with. You're really a shameless hypocrite.
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,533


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2020, 01:14:28 PM »

The one where he actually bothered to attempt to pass things of consequence, in good faith.

Not the one where he decided to do some dime store Reaganomics and waste time shagging someone.

You know the affair with Lewinsky was mostly during his first term, right?
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,240
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2020, 02:08:57 PM »

The one where he actually bothered to attempt to pass things of consequence, in good faith.

Not the one where he decided to do some dime store Reaganomics and waste time shagging someone.

You know the affair with Lewinsky was mostly during his first term, right?

Pretty sure he's referring to the scandal becoming public and the subsequent impeachment
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2020, 05:23:10 PM »

Depends on whether you mean George or DeWitt.
Logged
Battista Minola 1616
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,414
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2020, 05:51:11 PM »

Depends on whether you mean George or DeWitt.

I didn't think we were talking about New York state politics, but in that case I'll throw Hillary in the mix.
Logged
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2020, 01:40:01 PM »

Second, because he was no longer distracted by the gays-in-the-military issue, because he did not make any appointments to the Supreme Court, and because he worked successfully with Congress at balancing the budget.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2020, 06:38:04 PM »

First easily
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 13 queries.