which post was worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 10:32:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  which post was worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: which post was worse?
#1
post A
 
#2
post 2
 
#3
neither is "worse"  (yeah, I don't get it either)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: which post was worse?  (Read 347 times)
PSOL
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,164


« on: March 19, 2024, 12:10:45 PM »

lmao, well done Dead0

Obviously I don’t want society to break down as people by and large need to earn what they get in life and the government should not be bailing out corporations for what are largely their mistake. After a lot of thinking and dealing with UBI and my own situation, he who does not work should not eat unless they have a great alibi.

Beastiality should be understood as a historical phenomenon of the human condition. Alienation of humanity towards one another and the relative ease of living and prospering with animals has led to such a relationship being persistent. In the past, risk of disease and parasites was high and spread to other people in close proximity a threat. While beastiality is probably less common than it was in the past by a great magnitude thanks to urbanization and less exposure to animals, it is more visible online thanks to previously isolated practitioners meeting up online and posting away which gets outside attention. What differs is the change in scientific innovation and medical practices that makes such sex safer than ever if you know what to do.

People should generally have sexual relations with one another and going for animals weakens common solidarity among our race. Inherently there is no reason as to why such best practices as to ensure unity among us should not be promoted over any sort of intimate relations with animals. Animals are merely tools to be used to advance the human condition and ensure a better society, if pets and/or sex are the only things preventing someone from killing themselves as that’s the only thing they got, well we have to award some sort of flexibility here because a lot of them are in essential professions.
Logged
PSOL
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,164


« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2024, 09:04:55 PM »

It's a generally accepted principle of the law in many countries that crimes against property cannot be punished if they were committed for the purpose of preserving one's own (or a loved one's) life. So yeah, someone who shoplifts because they're starving should not be punished or even blamed. The fault belongs to a society that gives people no other choice to avoid starving. You'd have to have the compassion of a Hugo or Dickens villain not to recognize that.
The goal should be to ensure no one has any reason to steal at all as they have a shot at making bank and prospering fairly, not to just ignore real world structural problems and let people remain poor and desperate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.