Which theory is more plausible?

[Tetro Kornbluth]

If by Global Warming you mean "the greenhouse effect" then there is still some room for arguement, despite the scientific concensus being overwhelming believers (and I tend to think these people know their sh**t.. much more than some randommers on an Internet forum decidated to finding the percentages of cubans living in the north-west of West Virginia's fifth district.). But still more likely and plausible than chemtrails.

If by Global Warming you mean "the earth is getting hotter" well... let's just say this thread wasn't a very smart idea then. Facts are the greatest tool a scientist has.

I'm tempted to insert a General Ripper\Flouridation "tampering with our precious bodily fluids" joke.. but the question is where.....

[Tetro Kornbluth]

Also, I find not only the theory to be wrong, but the entire premise that socialism is justifiable because of it.

Shouldn't that read "Also, As the entire premise is that is socialism is justifiable because of it, I find the theory wrong"?

Come on, we all know that's why most libertarians have doubts on the Greenhouse effect. It's their putting ideology above science. (And I repeat I believe there are good reasons to doubt TGE from what I've read.)