Maybe if Trump was a better president his coverage would be better?
The media also covered Bush completely unfairly.
Maybe if Bush was a better president his coverage would have been better? I don’t know why you think it’s unfair that two awful presidents have had bad media coverage
Bush was a good president (without hindsight) until mid 2005 yet he was savaged by the media non stop in late 03 and all of 04.
Also the media also unfairly have covered HW other than late 1990-late 1991 , attacked romney non stop during the campaign.
They also attacked Harper , May , Modi unfairly as well .
Trump deserves the hate he got but the rest didn't
I think the victims of the Gujarat riots might disagree that Modi doesn't deserve hate.
Anyway, no Bush was not savaged in 2003. The media were cheerleaders for the Iraq war.
Harper won the endorsement of about 90% of newspapers in the 2011 election. Is it unfair that he didn't get 100%?
The media only turned on may after the disastrous election result. Do you seriously believe the coverage of May has been more unfair than that given to Corbyn?
In short, you're delusional and have a massive persecution complex